The case involves an application filed by the Liquidator of Maruthi Tubes Private Limited seeking directions to the Directors (Suspended Board) to extend assistance and cooperation to the Liquidator. The Liquidator claims that despite repeated requests, the Respondent has not furnished the required information and has not cooperated, hindering the liquidation process within the fixed timeframe. The Liquidator also contends that the Directors were non-cooperative even during the CIRP.
The Liquidator of Maruthi Tubes Private Limited filed an application seeking directions from the Directors (Suspended Board) to provide assistance and cooperation. The Liquidator alleges that despite repeated requests, the Respondent has not furnished the necessary information and has been uncooperative, hindering the liquidation process. The Directors were allegedly non-cooperative even during the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP). The Applicant communicated the commencement of the liquidation process to the Suspended Directors numerous times, but the Respondents neither responded nor provided the documents (23 items) as sought for by the Liquidator as detailed in Table-A page 11 of the Application as well as Books of Accounts, Tally Data and Estimates of
…Sign in to view the parties.
The Respondents were set ex-parte as none…
The Liquidator filed an application seeking…
The case involves an application filed by the Liquidator of Maruthi Tubes Private Limited seeking directions to the Directors (Suspended Board) to extend assistance and cooperation to the Liquidator. The Liquidator claims that despite repeated requests, the Respondent has not furnished the required information and has not cooperated, hindering the liquidation process within the fixed timeframe. The Liquidator also contends that the Directors were non-cooperative even during the CIRP.
The Liquidator of Maruthi Tubes Private Limited filed an application seeking directions from the Directors (Suspended Board) to provide assistance and cooperation. The Liquidator alleges that despite repeated requests, the Respondent has not furnished the necessary information and has been uncooperative, hindering the liquidation process. The Directors were allegedly non-cooperative even during the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP). The Applicant communicated the commencement of the liquidation process to the Suspended Directors numerous times, but the Respondents neither responded nor provided the documents (23 items) as sought for by the Liquidator as detailed in Table-A page 11 of the Application as well as Books of Accounts, Tally Data and Estimates of
…The Respondents were set ex-parte as none…
The Liquidator filed an application seeking…