The case involves an application (IA No.9 of 2022 in IA No.31 of 2020 in CP(IB) No. 492/7/HDB/2019) filed by the Applicant, Mr. Bandaru Purna Chandra Rao, seeking to reopen IA No.31 of 2020. The applicant sought directions for the Respondents to admit a principal claim amount for payments related to Design Analysis, Technical and Engineering Services rendered to M/s. KSK Mahanadi Power Company Limited. Earlier, IA No.31 of 2020 was dismissed on 21.07.2022, seeking the same reliefs.
Mr. Bandaru Purna Chandra Rao, an Operational Creditor, filed IA No.9 of 2022 seeking to reopen IA No.31 of 2020, which had been previously dismissed on 21.07.2022. The initial application, IA No.31 of 2020, sought directions for the Respondents to admit a principal claim amount for payments related to Design Analysis, Technical and Engineering Services rendered to M/s. KSK Mahanadi Power Company Limited. The Respondent contended that the application was not maintainable because the dismissal order of IA No.31 of 2020 was not challenged. The Applicant argued that the previous order had many errata and needed correction. The key fact is that the applicant did not appeal the original dismissal order. KSK Mahanadi Power Company is the Corporate Debtor.
Sign in to view the parties.
IA No.31 of 2020 was…
IA No.31 of 2…
The case involves an application (IA No.9 of 2022 in IA No.31 of 2020 in CP(IB) No. 492/7/HDB/2019) filed by the Applicant, Mr. Bandaru Purna Chandra Rao, seeking to reopen IA No.31 of 2020. The applicant sought directions for the Respondents to admit a principal claim amount for payments related to Design Analysis, Technical and Engineering Services rendered to M/s. KSK Mahanadi Power Company Limited. Earlier, IA No.31 of 2020 was dismissed on 21.07.2022, seeking the same reliefs.
Mr. Bandaru Purna Chandra Rao, an Operational Creditor, filed IA No.9 of 2022 seeking to reopen IA No.31 of 2020, which had been previously dismissed on 21.07.2022. The initial application, IA No.31 of 2020, sought directions for the Respondents to admit a principal claim amount for payments related to Design Analysis, Technical and Engineering Services rendered to M/s. KSK Mahanadi Power Company Limited. The Respondent contended that the application was not maintainable because the dismissal order of IA No.31 of 2020 was not challenged. The Applicant argued that the previous order had many errata and needed correction. The key fact is that the applicant did not appeal the original dismissal order. KSK Mahanadi Power Company is the Corporate Debtor.
IA No.31 of 2020 was…
IA No.31 of 2…