Kotak Mahindra Bank Limited filed a petition under Section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, to initiate Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) against Jotindra Steel and Tubes Limited, who acted as a corporate guarantor for its associate company, Mauria Udyog Limited. The financial creditor claimed that the corporate debtor furnished an unconditional corporate guarantee for the credit facilities extended to the borrower. The borrower defaulted on repayment, leading to the account being classified as NPA. The financial creditor recalled the loan facility and invoked the corporate guarantee. The corporate debtor argued that it never stood as a corporate guarantor and that the 'letter of comfort' provided was not a contract of guarantee. The
…Kotak Mahindra Bank Limited (financial creditor) filed a petition under Section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, against Jotindra Steel and Tubes Limited (corporate debtor) to initiate CIRP. The petition was based on the premise that Jotindra Steel and Tubes Limited acted as a corporate guarantor for a loan facility extended to Mauria Udyog Limited (borrower). The financial creditor claimed that the corporate debtor had furnished an unconditional corporate guarantee. The borrower defaulted on repayment, leading to the account being classified as a Non-Performing Asset (NPA) on 2020-02-04. The financial creditor recalled the loan facility and invoked the corporate guarantee. The corporate debtor argued that it never stood as a corporate guarantor and that
…Sign in to view the parties.
Jotindra Steel and…
Sanction Letter issued for credit…
Kotak Mahindra Bank Limited filed a petition under Section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, to initiate Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) against Jotindra Steel and Tubes Limited, who acted as a corporate guarantor for its associate company, Mauria Udyog Limited. The financial creditor claimed that the corporate debtor furnished an unconditional corporate guarantee for the credit facilities extended to the borrower. The borrower defaulted on repayment, leading to the account being classified as NPA. The financial creditor recalled the loan facility and invoked the corporate guarantee. The corporate debtor argued that it never stood as a corporate guarantor and that the 'letter of comfort' provided was not a contract of guarantee. The
…Kotak Mahindra Bank Limited (financial creditor) filed a petition under Section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, against Jotindra Steel and Tubes Limited (corporate debtor) to initiate CIRP. The petition was based on the premise that Jotindra Steel and Tubes Limited acted as a corporate guarantor for a loan facility extended to Mauria Udyog Limited (borrower). The financial creditor claimed that the corporate debtor had furnished an unconditional corporate guarantee. The borrower defaulted on repayment, leading to the account being classified as a Non-Performing Asset (NPA) on 2020-02-04. The financial creditor recalled the loan facility and invoked the corporate guarantee. The corporate debtor argued that it never stood as a corporate guarantor and that
…Jotindra Steel and…
Sanction Letter issued for credit…