The case involves a challenge to the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) initiated against IRIS Electro Optics Pvt Ltd by Laxmi Kantha Rao Thota, a financial creditor. Bank of India, another financial creditor, filed an application (IA 785/2019) seeking recall of the order admitting the company petition, approval of a new Resolution Professional (RP), declaration of the voting share allotted to Laxmi Kantha Rao Thota as illegal, and a declaration that certain CoC meetings and the appointment of the existing RP are null and void. The bank also sought to hold the expenses incurred under CIRP to be borne by the financial creditor and impose costs of Rs. 1 Crore on the financial creditor for abusing the process of law. The NCLT initially dismissed IA 785/2019,
…1. Laxmi Kantha Rao Thota initiated CIRP against IRIS Electro Optics Pvt Ltd.
2. Bank of India, another financial creditor, challenged the CIRP.
3. Archana Thota, wife of Laxmi Kantha Rao Thota, is a director of IRIS Electro Optics Pvt Ltd.
4. Archana Thota's resignation as director was disputed.
5. Bank of India initiated recovery measures under SARFAESI Act before CIRP.
6. The Corporate Debtor's account was classified as NPA.
7. The Resolution Professional's conduct and voting rights allocation were questioned.
8. The NCLAT directed the NCLT to reconsider the matter focusing on 'related party' status and fraudulent initiation.
9. The RP rejected the claim of Bank of India on technical grounds.
10. Bank of India lodged a complaint against the RP before IBBI.
Sign in to view the parties.
Archana Thota was…
Bank of India initiated actions under the…
The case involves a challenge to the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) initiated against IRIS Electro Optics Pvt Ltd by Laxmi Kantha Rao Thota, a financial creditor. Bank of India, another financial creditor, filed an application (IA 785/2019) seeking recall of the order admitting the company petition, approval of a new Resolution Professional (RP), declaration of the voting share allotted to Laxmi Kantha Rao Thota as illegal, and a declaration that certain CoC meetings and the appointment of the existing RP are null and void. The bank also sought to hold the expenses incurred under CIRP to be borne by the financial creditor and impose costs of Rs. 1 Crore on the financial creditor for abusing the process of law. The NCLT initially dismissed IA 785/2019,
…1. Laxmi Kantha Rao Thota initiated CIRP against IRIS Electro Optics Pvt Ltd.
2. Bank of India, another financial creditor, challenged the CIRP.
3. Archana Thota, wife of Laxmi Kantha Rao Thota, is a director of IRIS Electro Optics Pvt Ltd.
4. Archana Thota's resignation as director was disputed.
5. Bank of India initiated recovery measures under SARFAESI Act before CIRP.
6. The Corporate Debtor's account was classified as NPA.
7. The Resolution Professional's conduct and voting rights allocation were questioned.
8. The NCLAT directed the NCLT to reconsider the matter focusing on 'related party' status and fraudulent initiation.
9. The RP rejected the claim of Bank of India on technical grounds.
10. Bank of India lodged a complaint against the RP before IBBI.
Archana Thota was…
Bank of India initiated actions under the…