The case pertains to an order under Section 9 of the Insolvency & Bankruptcy Code, 2016. The petitioner sought an adjournment due to difficulties in obtaining instructions from their client in Mainland, China, citing language constraints. The respondent's counsel appeared physically and confirmed payment of costs imposed. The court noted the petitioner's lack of seriousness in prosecuting the matter.
Pair Hong Kong Co Limited filed a petition against Igrphenix Electron Private Limited under Section 9 of the Insolvency & Bankruptcy Code, 2016. The petitioner's counsel, Mr. Rohit Chaudhary, requested an adjournment due to difficulties in obtaining instructions from his client located in Mainland, China, citing language constraints and the time required for communication. The respondent's counsel, Ms. Reema Khorana, appeared physically and confirmed that the cost imposed upon the Respondent/CD has been paid and the proof of payment regarding the same is submitted. The court observed that the petitioner had not filed the list of dates and events and issue-wise chart as directed. The court noted the petitioner's lack of seriousness in prosecuting the matter and
…Sign in to view the parties.
The reply to the…
The court recorded the…
The case pertains to an order under Section 9 of the Insolvency & Bankruptcy Code, 2016. The petitioner sought an adjournment due to difficulties in obtaining instructions from their client in Mainland, China, citing language constraints. The respondent's counsel appeared physically and confirmed payment of costs imposed. The court noted the petitioner's lack of seriousness in prosecuting the matter.
Pair Hong Kong Co Limited filed a petition against Igrphenix Electron Private Limited under Section 9 of the Insolvency & Bankruptcy Code, 2016. The petitioner's counsel, Mr. Rohit Chaudhary, requested an adjournment due to difficulties in obtaining instructions from his client located in Mainland, China, citing language constraints and the time required for communication. The respondent's counsel, Ms. Reema Khorana, appeared physically and confirmed that the cost imposed upon the Respondent/CD has been paid and the proof of payment regarding the same is submitted. The court observed that the petitioner had not filed the list of dates and events and issue-wise chart as directed. The court noted the petitioner's lack of seriousness in prosecuting the matter and
…The reply to the…
The court recorded the…