The case involves an application filed by the Resolution Professional (RP) of Hindustan Controls and Equipment Private Limited, the Corporate Debtor, seeking to set aside an arbitral award. The RP contends that the arbitral award was passed after the initiation of the resolution process against the Corporate Debtor, violating the moratorium imposed under Section 14 of the IBC. The arbitrator was allegedly aware of the insolvency proceedings but continued with the arbitration. The applicant cited a Supreme Court decision stating that arbitration instituted after the moratorium is non est in law.
Hindustan Controls and Equipment Private Limited is undergoing a Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP). An arbitral award was passed against Hindustan Controls and Equipment Private Limited. The Resolution Professional (RP) of Hindustan Controls and Equipment Private Limited filed an application before the NCLT to set aside the arbitral award. The RP argued that the arbitral award was passed after the initiation of the CIRP and in violation of the moratorium under Section 14 of the IBC. The arbitrator was allegedly aware of the CIRP but proceeded with the arbitration. Steel Authority of India (SAIL) is the respondent in the application. The respondent contended that the NCLT lacks jurisdiction to set aside the arbitral award and that the challenge should be
…Sign in to view the parties.
Filing of CP(…
Order passed initiating…
The case involves an application filed by the Resolution Professional (RP) of Hindustan Controls and Equipment Private Limited, the Corporate Debtor, seeking to set aside an arbitral award. The RP contends that the arbitral award was passed after the initiation of the resolution process against the Corporate Debtor, violating the moratorium imposed under Section 14 of the IBC. The arbitrator was allegedly aware of the insolvency proceedings but continued with the arbitration. The applicant cited a Supreme Court decision stating that arbitration instituted after the moratorium is non est in law.
Hindustan Controls and Equipment Private Limited is undergoing a Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP). An arbitral award was passed against Hindustan Controls and Equipment Private Limited. The Resolution Professional (RP) of Hindustan Controls and Equipment Private Limited filed an application before the NCLT to set aside the arbitral award. The RP argued that the arbitral award was passed after the initiation of the CIRP and in violation of the moratorium under Section 14 of the IBC. The arbitrator was allegedly aware of the CIRP but proceeded with the arbitration. Steel Authority of India (SAIL) is the respondent in the application. The respondent contended that the NCLT lacks jurisdiction to set aside the arbitral award and that the challenge should be
…Filing of CP(…
Order passed initiating…