The case involves a cross-application filed by parties seeking directions for adjudication and disposal of issues related to the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) of Guman Builders & Developers Private Limited. Canara Bank, a secured creditor, filed a Miscellaneous Application (MA) for withdrawal of the CIRP under Section 12A of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC). Simultaneously, the Interim Resolution Professional (IRP), Lalit Mohan Sharma, filed an Interim Application (IA) seeking directions to the Committee of Creditors (CoC) regarding appointment of a resolution professional and approval of CIRP costs. The CIRP was initiated based on an application under Section 9 of the IBC by Rajesh Kumar Sharma, an operational creditor. The corporate
…Rajesh Kumar Sharma, an operational creditor, initiated CIRP against Guman Builders & Developers Private Limited under Section 9 of the IBC. Lalit Mohan Sharma was appointed as the IRP. The IRP constituted a CoC, with Canara Bank and Rajasthan Financial Corporation (RFC) holding a significant voting share (95.78%). The corporate debtor's assets were attached by the ED due to pending CBI cases related to a Syndicate Bank fraud of Rs. 76.61 Crores. Canara Bank, holding 60.98% of the voting share, filed an application for withdrawal of the CIRP under Section 12A of the IBC. The IRP refused to file the withdrawal application, citing Section 12A requires the original applicant (operational creditor) to file. The CoC was reluctant to approve CIRP costs or appoint a
…Sign in to view the parties.
CP No. (IB)- 43/9/JPR/20…
Adjudicating Authority…
The case involves a cross-application filed by parties seeking directions for adjudication and disposal of issues related to the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) of Guman Builders & Developers Private Limited. Canara Bank, a secured creditor, filed a Miscellaneous Application (MA) for withdrawal of the CIRP under Section 12A of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC). Simultaneously, the Interim Resolution Professional (IRP), Lalit Mohan Sharma, filed an Interim Application (IA) seeking directions to the Committee of Creditors (CoC) regarding appointment of a resolution professional and approval of CIRP costs. The CIRP was initiated based on an application under Section 9 of the IBC by Rajesh Kumar Sharma, an operational creditor. The corporate
…Rajesh Kumar Sharma, an operational creditor, initiated CIRP against Guman Builders & Developers Private Limited under Section 9 of the IBC. Lalit Mohan Sharma was appointed as the IRP. The IRP constituted a CoC, with Canara Bank and Rajasthan Financial Corporation (RFC) holding a significant voting share (95.78%). The corporate debtor's assets were attached by the ED due to pending CBI cases related to a Syndicate Bank fraud of Rs. 76.61 Crores. Canara Bank, holding 60.98% of the voting share, filed an application for withdrawal of the CIRP under Section 12A of the IBC. The IRP refused to file the withdrawal application, citing Section 12A requires the original applicant (operational creditor) to file. The CoC was reluctant to approve CIRP costs or appoint a
…CP No. (IB)- 43/9/JPR/20…
Adjudicating Authority…