The application was filed seeking to recall an order dated February 16, 2024, which the applicants contended was a nullity in law, void ab initio, and passed per incuriam, in ignoratium of binding statutory provisions and judgments. The applicants also sought interim reliefs including a report on incidents related to the cause list publication and the recording of proceedings.
The application, IA 347 of 2024, was filed invoking the Tribunal's duty to act Ex Debito Justitiale and its powers under Section 44 of the Evidence Act, read with Rule 11 of the NCLT Rules (2016). It sought to recall an order dated February 16, 2024, in Cont. Pet. 19 of 2023 and Cont. Pet. No. 20 of 2023 in IA No. 419 of 2017 in C.P.(IB) No. 40 of 2017, alleging it to be a nullity. The applicant's counsel requested an adjournment during the hearing on February 20, 2024, to argue the matter in detail. While IA 343 of 2024 was disposed of, IA 347 of 2024 was further heard for its maintainability and admission, and orders were reserved. The counsel stated he would not argue other related matters unless an order was passed in IA 347/2024. The applicant submitted that there
…Sign in to view the parties.
Contempt Petitions No. 19 and 20 of 2023 were…
Court I pronounced orders in Cont. P 19 and 20…
Sign in to view related legal provisions.
The application was filed seeking to recall an order dated February 16, 2024, which the applicants contended was a nullity in law, void ab initio, and passed per incuriam, in ignoratium of binding statutory provisions and judgments. The applicants also sought interim reliefs including a report on incidents related to the cause list publication and the recording of proceedings.
The application, IA 347 of 2024, was filed invoking the Tribunal's duty to act Ex Debito Justitiale and its powers under Section 44 of the Evidence Act, read with Rule 11 of the NCLT Rules (2016). It sought to recall an order dated February 16, 2024, in Cont. Pet. 19 of 2023 and Cont. Pet. No. 20 of 2023 in IA No. 419 of 2017 in C.P.(IB) No. 40 of 2017, alleging it to be a nullity. The applicant's counsel requested an adjournment during the hearing on February 20, 2024, to argue the matter in detail. While IA 343 of 2024 was disposed of, IA 347 of 2024 was further heard for its maintainability and admission, and orders were reserved. The counsel stated he would not argue other related matters unless an order was passed in IA 347/2024. The applicant submitted that there
…Contempt Petitions No. 19 and 20 of 2023 were…
Court I pronounced orders in Cont. P 19 and 20…
Sign in to view related legal provisions.