The application was filed by ODAT-GmbH against Shantanu Bhrama, the Interim Resolution Professional, and the Committee of Creditors of Darjeeling Organic Tea Estates, seeking the recall of an order passed by the Tribunal in IA No. 1649/KB/2023. The applicant contended that they were not given an opportunity to make a rejoinder to oral submissions made on behalf of the respondents.
ODAT-GmbH filed an application seeking the recall of an order passed by the NCLT in IA No. 1649/KB/2023. The basis for seeking the recall was that the applicant was not given an opportunity to make a rejoinder to the oral submissions made on behalf of the respondents. Simultaneously, the applicant moved the Hon'ble NCLAT against the same order. The Hon'ble NCLAT allowed the appeal and set aside the order passed by the NCLT. The NCLT considered the fact that the NCLAT had already set aside the order and concluded that the application for recall had become infructuous.
Sign in to view the parties.
Tribunal passed an…
The Applicant…
The application was filed by ODAT-GmbH against Shantanu Bhrama, the Interim Resolution Professional, and the Committee of Creditors of Darjeeling Organic Tea Estates, seeking the recall of an order passed by the Tribunal in IA No. 1649/KB/2023. The applicant contended that they were not given an opportunity to make a rejoinder to oral submissions made on behalf of the respondents.
ODAT-GmbH filed an application seeking the recall of an order passed by the NCLT in IA No. 1649/KB/2023. The basis for seeking the recall was that the applicant was not given an opportunity to make a rejoinder to the oral submissions made on behalf of the respondents. Simultaneously, the applicant moved the Hon'ble NCLAT against the same order. The Hon'ble NCLAT allowed the appeal and set aside the order passed by the NCLT. The NCLT considered the fact that the NCLAT had already set aside the order and concluded that the application for recall had become infructuous.
Tribunal passed an…
The Applicant…