The case involves multiple applications (IA No. 572/2022, 32/2021, 166/2021, 179/2022) filed in connection with the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) of C & C Towers Limited. The primary dispute revolves around the approval of a resolution plan for the corporate debtor, C & C Towers Limited, which is developing a Bus Terminal-cum-Commercial Complex at Mohali under a concession agreement with Greater Mohali Area Development Authority (GMADA). GMADA, being the land owner and a significant operational creditor, raised objections to the resolution plan, particularly concerning the concessions sought from it by the Resolution Applicant (Mahakram Developers Private Limited). The resolution plan proposed certain reliefs and concessions from GMADA,
…C & C Towers Limited was undergoing CIRP due to financial difficulties. The company was developing a Bus Terminal-cum-Commercial Complex at Mohali under a concession agreement with GMADA. GMADA, as the land owner, was a major operational creditor. The Resolution Applicant, Mahakram Developers Private Limited, submitted a resolution plan that sought certain concessions from GMADA, including waivers of penalties, revision of concession fees, and modifications to the concession agreement. GMADA objected to the resolution plan, arguing that these concessions were not part of the original agreement and that the CoC could not dictate terms to the owner of the land. GMADA issued a notice dated 04.04.2016 to show cause to the Corporate Debtor as to why the said Concession
…Sign in to view the parties.
GMADA and C & C Towers Limited entered into a…
GMADA issued a notice to C & C Towers Limited…
The case involves multiple applications (IA No. 572/2022, 32/2021, 166/2021, 179/2022) filed in connection with the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) of C & C Towers Limited. The primary dispute revolves around the approval of a resolution plan for the corporate debtor, C & C Towers Limited, which is developing a Bus Terminal-cum-Commercial Complex at Mohali under a concession agreement with Greater Mohali Area Development Authority (GMADA). GMADA, being the land owner and a significant operational creditor, raised objections to the resolution plan, particularly concerning the concessions sought from it by the Resolution Applicant (Mahakram Developers Private Limited). The resolution plan proposed certain reliefs and concessions from GMADA,
…C & C Towers Limited was undergoing CIRP due to financial difficulties. The company was developing a Bus Terminal-cum-Commercial Complex at Mohali under a concession agreement with GMADA. GMADA, as the land owner, was a major operational creditor. The Resolution Applicant, Mahakram Developers Private Limited, submitted a resolution plan that sought certain concessions from GMADA, including waivers of penalties, revision of concession fees, and modifications to the concession agreement. GMADA objected to the resolution plan, arguing that these concessions were not part of the original agreement and that the CoC could not dictate terms to the owner of the land. GMADA issued a notice dated 04.04.2016 to show cause to the Corporate Debtor as to why the said Concession
…GMADA and C & C Towers Limited entered into a…
GMADA issued a notice to C & C Towers Limited…