The case involves a Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) initiated against Bhagatpur Tea Company Limited. The CIRP was ordered on September 5, 2022, and an Interim Resolution Professional (IRP) was appointed. However, before the Committee of Creditors (CoC) could be constituted, the parties reached a settlement, and the Suspended Director filed an application to recall the order initiating CIRP.
The Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) was initiated against Bhagatpur Tea Company Limited on September 5, 2022. An Interim Resolution Professional (IRP) was appointed. Before the Committee of Creditors (CoC) could be formed, the involved parties reached a settlement. The Suspended Director then filed an application to recall the order initiating the CIRP. The court noted that the CoC had not been constituted. The parties' settlement is a key fact influencing the court's decision to allow the application and dismiss the CIRP.
Sign in to view the parties.
The CIRP was ordered…
Hearing on the matter…
The case involves a Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) initiated against Bhagatpur Tea Company Limited. The CIRP was ordered on September 5, 2022, and an Interim Resolution Professional (IRP) was appointed. However, before the Committee of Creditors (CoC) could be constituted, the parties reached a settlement, and the Suspended Director filed an application to recall the order initiating CIRP.
The Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) was initiated against Bhagatpur Tea Company Limited on September 5, 2022. An Interim Resolution Professional (IRP) was appointed. Before the Committee of Creditors (CoC) could be formed, the involved parties reached a settlement. The Suspended Director then filed an application to recall the order initiating the CIRP. The court noted that the CoC had not been constituted. The parties' settlement is a key fact influencing the court's decision to allow the application and dismiss the CIRP.
The CIRP was ordered…
Hearing on the matter…