Mount Overseas Private Limited filed a petition under Sections 424 and 434 of the Companies Act, 2013, seeking directions for Respondent No. 1 (Bee Electronics Machines Limited) to transfer the right, title, and interest in subject properties after executing the Conveyance Deed and for Respondent No. 2 (Canara Bank) to execute sale deeds in favor of the Petitioner. The case originates from Respondent No. 1 being declared a sick industrial company and Respondent No. 2 being appointed as the Operating Agency (OA) by the BIFR. The Petitioner participated in a public auction conducted by Respondent No. 2 and submitted the highest bid, which was accepted by the BIFR. However, disputes arose regarding the execution of sale deeds and the refund of the bid amount after the
…Mount Overseas Private Limited (the Petitioner) filed a Company Petition (CP (IB) 1152/MB/2017) under Section 424 & Section 434 of the Companies Act, 2013, seeking directions against Bee Electronics Machines Limited (Respondent No. 1) and Canara Bank (Respondent No. 2). Respondent No. 1 was referred to the Board of Industrial and Financial Restructuring (BIFR) and declared a sick industrial company on 28.02.2006. Canara Bank (Respondent No. 2) was appointed as the Operating Agency (OA). In 2012, Respondent No. 1 had liabilities, and the BIFR permitted the sale of subject properties. On 29.11.2012, Respondent No. 2 advertised the sale and received five bids. The Petitioner submitted the highest bid of Rs.2.70 crores and issued an earnest money cheque of Rs.30 lakhs.
…Sign in to view the parties.
Respondent No.1…
Respondent No.1 had…
Sign in to view related legal provisions.
Mount Overseas Private Limited filed a petition under Sections 424 and 434 of the Companies Act, 2013, seeking directions for Respondent No. 1 (Bee Electronics Machines Limited) to transfer the right, title, and interest in subject properties after executing the Conveyance Deed and for Respondent No. 2 (Canara Bank) to execute sale deeds in favor of the Petitioner. The case originates from Respondent No. 1 being declared a sick industrial company and Respondent No. 2 being appointed as the Operating Agency (OA) by the BIFR. The Petitioner participated in a public auction conducted by Respondent No. 2 and submitted the highest bid, which was accepted by the BIFR. However, disputes arose regarding the execution of sale deeds and the refund of the bid amount after the
…Mount Overseas Private Limited (the Petitioner) filed a Company Petition (CP (IB) 1152/MB/2017) under Section 424 & Section 434 of the Companies Act, 2013, seeking directions against Bee Electronics Machines Limited (Respondent No. 1) and Canara Bank (Respondent No. 2). Respondent No. 1 was referred to the Board of Industrial and Financial Restructuring (BIFR) and declared a sick industrial company on 28.02.2006. Canara Bank (Respondent No. 2) was appointed as the Operating Agency (OA). In 2012, Respondent No. 1 had liabilities, and the BIFR permitted the sale of subject properties. On 29.11.2012, Respondent No. 2 advertised the sale and received five bids. The Petitioner submitted the highest bid of Rs.2.70 crores and issued an earnest money cheque of Rs.30 lakhs.
…Respondent No.1…
Respondent No.1 had…
Sign in to view related legal provisions.