The case pertains to a petition filed under Section 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016. The applicant, M/s. Graphisads Pvt Ltd, filed the petition against the respondent, M/s. Ansal Hi - Tech Townships Ltd. The matter was listed before the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT), New Delhi.
M/s. Graphisads Pvt Ltd filed a petition against M/s. Ansal Hi - Tech Townships Ltd under Section 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016. On the date of the hearing, no one appeared for the applicant, despite repeated calls. The court observed that on the last date of hearing, the parties had sought an adjournment, stating that settlement talks were in progress. The court inferred from this that the petitioner was not interested in pursuing the matter. Consequently, the court dismissed the petition for non-prosecution.
Sign in to view the parties.
M/s. Graphisads Pvt Ltd filed a petition against…
Parties sought…
Sign in to view related legal provisions.
The case pertains to a petition filed under Section 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016. The applicant, M/s. Graphisads Pvt Ltd, filed the petition against the respondent, M/s. Ansal Hi - Tech Townships Ltd. The matter was listed before the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT), New Delhi.
M/s. Graphisads Pvt Ltd filed a petition against M/s. Ansal Hi - Tech Townships Ltd under Section 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016. On the date of the hearing, no one appeared for the applicant, despite repeated calls. The court observed that on the last date of hearing, the parties had sought an adjournment, stating that settlement talks were in progress. The court inferred from this that the petitioner was not interested in pursuing the matter. Consequently, the court dismissed the petition for non-prosecution.
M/s. Graphisads Pvt Ltd filed a petition against…
Parties sought…
Sign in to view related legal provisions.