The case involves a petition under Section 9 of the IBC. The Corporate Debtor (CD) entered an appearance on 21.11.2023, indicating a potential settlement. The Counsel for the CD submitted on 18.12.2023 that the CD had initiated settlement talks with the OC (Operational Creditor). Both parties requested time for settlement on 15.01.2024, leading to an adjournment until 05.02.2024. On 05.02.2024, the OC requested further time for settlement as a last chance.
On 2023-11-21, the Corporate Debtor (CD) appeared, suggesting a possible settlement. The CD's counsel stated on 2023-12-18 that settlement talks with the Operational Creditor (OC) had begun. Both parties requested more time to settle on 2024-01-15, and the matter was postponed to 2024-02-05. The OC requested one last extension for settlement on 2024-02-05. However, neither the OC nor the CD was present at the hearing. The OC's lack of intent to pursue the case was evident, leading to the dismissal of the Company Petition (C.P.). The key fact is the absence of both parties and the OC's lack of intent to pursue the matter, which led to the dismissal of the C.P.
Sign in to view the parties.
The Corporate Debtor…
The Counsel for the CD…
The case involves a petition under Section 9 of the IBC. The Corporate Debtor (CD) entered an appearance on 21.11.2023, indicating a potential settlement. The Counsel for the CD submitted on 18.12.2023 that the CD had initiated settlement talks with the OC (Operational Creditor). Both parties requested time for settlement on 15.01.2024, leading to an adjournment until 05.02.2024. On 05.02.2024, the OC requested further time for settlement as a last chance.
On 2023-11-21, the Corporate Debtor (CD) appeared, suggesting a possible settlement. The CD's counsel stated on 2023-12-18 that settlement talks with the Operational Creditor (OC) had begun. Both parties requested more time to settle on 2024-01-15, and the matter was postponed to 2024-02-05. The OC requested one last extension for settlement on 2024-02-05. However, neither the OC nor the CD was present at the hearing. The OC's lack of intent to pursue the case was evident, leading to the dismissal of the Company Petition (C.P.). The key fact is the absence of both parties and the OC's lack of intent to pursue the matter, which led to the dismissal of the C.P.
The Corporate Debtor…
The Counsel for the CD…