The case involves a petition filed under Section 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016. Both parties were present during the hearing. The petitioner's counsel submitted that the matter had been amicably settled between the parties, and a deed of settlement was filed.
The petitioner filed a petition under Section 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016. During the hearing, both parties were present. The petitioner's counsel informed the court that the matter had been amicably settled between the parties, and a deed of settlement was filed. The deed of settlement was taken on record. Subsequently, the petitioner's counsel requested the withdrawal of the petition. The relevance of these facts lies in the court's decision to dismiss the petition based on the settlement and the withdrawal request.
Sign in to view the parties.
Hearing of the Mumbai…
Deed of sett…
The case involves a petition filed under Section 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016. Both parties were present during the hearing. The petitioner's counsel submitted that the matter had been amicably settled between the parties, and a deed of settlement was filed.
The petitioner filed a petition under Section 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016. During the hearing, both parties were present. The petitioner's counsel informed the court that the matter had been amicably settled between the parties, and a deed of settlement was filed. The deed of settlement was taken on record. Subsequently, the petitioner's counsel requested the withdrawal of the petition. The relevance of these facts lies in the court's decision to dismiss the petition based on the settlement and the withdrawal request.
Hearing of the Mumbai…
Deed of sett…