The case involves a petition filed under Section 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) by Swastika Chemicals, an operational creditor, against Yagmag Labs Pvt Ltd, the corporate debtor. The operational creditor sought initiation of the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) against the corporate debtor. However, during the proceedings, it was brought to the court's attention that CIRP had already been initiated against the corporate debtor in another case (CP(IB)No. 593/9/HDB/2019), and a moratorium had been imposed.
Swastika Chemicals, an operational creditor, filed a petition under Section 9 of the IBC against Yagmag Labs Pvt Ltd, the corporate debtor, seeking to initiate CIRP. During the proceedings, it was revealed that CIRP had already commenced against Yagmag Labs Pvt Ltd in CP(IB)No. 593/9/HDB/2019, and a moratorium had been imposed. Consequently, Swastika Chemicals filed a withdrawal memo. The court noted that the petition by Swastika Chemicals had not yet been admitted. The relevance of the CIRP commencement and the moratorium is that they legally bar the continuation of other proceedings against the corporate debtor.
Sign in to view the parties.
Swastika Chemicals…
Hearing he…
The case involves a petition filed under Section 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) by Swastika Chemicals, an operational creditor, against Yagmag Labs Pvt Ltd, the corporate debtor. The operational creditor sought initiation of the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) against the corporate debtor. However, during the proceedings, it was brought to the court's attention that CIRP had already been initiated against the corporate debtor in another case (CP(IB)No. 593/9/HDB/2019), and a moratorium had been imposed.
Swastika Chemicals, an operational creditor, filed a petition under Section 9 of the IBC against Yagmag Labs Pvt Ltd, the corporate debtor, seeking to initiate CIRP. During the proceedings, it was revealed that CIRP had already commenced against Yagmag Labs Pvt Ltd in CP(IB)No. 593/9/HDB/2019, and a moratorium had been imposed. Consequently, Swastika Chemicals filed a withdrawal memo. The court noted that the petition by Swastika Chemicals had not yet been admitted. The relevance of the CIRP commencement and the moratorium is that they legally bar the continuation of other proceedings against the corporate debtor.
Swastika Chemicals…
Hearing he…