VRG Healthcare Private Limited filed a petition under Section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, claiming to be a financial creditor of VRG Infrastructure Private Limited. VRG Healthcare claimed to have extended an unsecured loan of Rs. 25,00,000/- to VRG Infrastructure, which defaulted on repayment. VRG Infrastructure contested the claim, arguing that there was no agreement for interest payment and that the amount advanced was not against the time value of money. The Corporate Debtor also argued that the petition was filed to pressurize one of its directors, Gitesh Muttemwar, who had a claim against Dr. Sameer Paltewar, a director in the Petitioner company. The Corporate Debtor also pointed out ongoing disputes within the management of the Petitioner
…VRG Healthcare Private Limited (Petitioner) claimed to be a financial creditor of VRG Infrastructure Private Limited (Corporate Debtor), seeking initiation of CIRP under Section 7 of IBC. The Petitioner stated to have furnished Form No. 1 under Rule 4 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy (Application to Adjudicating Authority) Rules, 2016. The Petitioner claimed to have extended an unsecured loan of Rs. 15,00,000/- on 2017-07-21 and Rs. 10,00,000/- on 2017-08-05, totaling Rs. 25,00,000/-, with an outstanding default of Rs. 33,85,000/- including interest @18% p.a. The Petitioner sent a legal notice to the Corporate Debtor on 2019-01-10 due to unpaid loan. The Corporate Debtor contended that there was no agreement for interest payment and that the advance was not for the
…Sign in to view the parties.
The Insolven…
VRG Healthcare Private Limited allegedly…
VRG Healthcare Private Limited filed a petition under Section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, claiming to be a financial creditor of VRG Infrastructure Private Limited. VRG Healthcare claimed to have extended an unsecured loan of Rs. 25,00,000/- to VRG Infrastructure, which defaulted on repayment. VRG Infrastructure contested the claim, arguing that there was no agreement for interest payment and that the amount advanced was not against the time value of money. The Corporate Debtor also argued that the petition was filed to pressurize one of its directors, Gitesh Muttemwar, who had a claim against Dr. Sameer Paltewar, a director in the Petitioner company. The Corporate Debtor also pointed out ongoing disputes within the management of the Petitioner
…VRG Healthcare Private Limited (Petitioner) claimed to be a financial creditor of VRG Infrastructure Private Limited (Corporate Debtor), seeking initiation of CIRP under Section 7 of IBC. The Petitioner stated to have furnished Form No. 1 under Rule 4 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy (Application to Adjudicating Authority) Rules, 2016. The Petitioner claimed to have extended an unsecured loan of Rs. 15,00,000/- on 2017-07-21 and Rs. 10,00,000/- on 2017-08-05, totaling Rs. 25,00,000/-, with an outstanding default of Rs. 33,85,000/- including interest @18% p.a. The Petitioner sent a legal notice to the Corporate Debtor on 2019-01-10 due to unpaid loan. The Corporate Debtor contended that there was no agreement for interest payment and that the advance was not for the
…The Insolven…
VRG Healthcare Private Limited allegedly…