The case involves an application filed under Section 33(2) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (IBC) seeking liquidation of the Corporate Debtor, Vasan Construction Company Private Limited. The Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) was initiated after a petition filed by a financial creditor was admitted by the Tribunal. An Interim Resolution Professional (IRP) was appointed, and a moratorium was declared. The IRP convened six Committee of Creditors (CoC) meetings. Despite three publications calling for Expressions of Interest (EoIs) from prospective Resolution Applicants, none were received. The CIRP period was extended by 90 days, but the response remained nil. The CoC resolved to liquidate the Corporate Debtor. The fair value and liquidation value
…Vasan Construction Company Private Limited underwent Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) following the admission of a petition by a financial creditor. A.R. Ramasubramania Raja was appointed as the Interim Resolution Professional (IRP). The IRP convened six meetings of the Committee of Creditors (CoC). Three publications were made inviting Expressions of Interest (EoIs) for resolution plans, but no responses were received. The CIRP period was extended by 90 days, but still no EoIs were filed. The CoC resolved to liquidate the Corporate Debtor. The fair value and liquidation value of the Corporate Debtor were assessed. The IRP filed an application under Section 33(2) of the IBC seeking liquidation and appointment as the liquidator. The Tribunal noted that the
…Sign in to view the parties.
CIRP initiated based on…
Appointment of Interim…
The case involves an application filed under Section 33(2) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (IBC) seeking liquidation of the Corporate Debtor, Vasan Construction Company Private Limited. The Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) was initiated after a petition filed by a financial creditor was admitted by the Tribunal. An Interim Resolution Professional (IRP) was appointed, and a moratorium was declared. The IRP convened six Committee of Creditors (CoC) meetings. Despite three publications calling for Expressions of Interest (EoIs) from prospective Resolution Applicants, none were received. The CIRP period was extended by 90 days, but the response remained nil. The CoC resolved to liquidate the Corporate Debtor. The fair value and liquidation value
…Vasan Construction Company Private Limited underwent Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) following the admission of a petition by a financial creditor. A.R. Ramasubramania Raja was appointed as the Interim Resolution Professional (IRP). The IRP convened six meetings of the Committee of Creditors (CoC). Three publications were made inviting Expressions of Interest (EoIs) for resolution plans, but no responses were received. The CIRP period was extended by 90 days, but still no EoIs were filed. The CoC resolved to liquidate the Corporate Debtor. The fair value and liquidation value of the Corporate Debtor were assessed. The IRP filed an application under Section 33(2) of the IBC seeking liquidation and appointment as the liquidator. The Tribunal noted that the
…CIRP initiated based on…
Appointment of Interim…