Daaksh Jute LLP filed an application (IA/849(KB)2021) against the attachment of their ODCC account by R-1 and R-2. The applicant sought a declaration that the notice dated 21/09/2021 is illegal, arguing that the Employees Provident Fund Organisation's claim had already been filed with the Liquidator. The Liquidator and Provident Fund Authorities objected to the application's maintainability. The court considered the situation where the applicant's bank facilities were attached, preventing the payment of workers' wages.
Daaksh Jute LLP filed IA/849(KB)2021 against the attachment of their ODCC account (no. 50200055570842) maintained with HDFC Bank Ltd., Liluah Branch, Howrah. The attachment was done by R-1 and R-2. The applicant also has a current account (no. 50200054829521). The applicant sought a declaration that the notice dated 21/09/2021 is illegal because the Employees Provident Fund Organisation's claim was already filed with the Liquidator. The Liquidator and Provident Fund Authorities objected to the maintainability of the application, citing section 60(5) of the Code. The applicant relied on an operating Lease Agreement dated 01/08/2016. The attachment of the bank account prevented the payment of workers' wages, causing potential hardship. The court issued an interim order
…Sign in to view the parties.
Date of the operating…
Date of the impugned…
Daaksh Jute LLP filed an application (IA/849(KB)2021) against the attachment of their ODCC account by R-1 and R-2. The applicant sought a declaration that the notice dated 21/09/2021 is illegal, arguing that the Employees Provident Fund Organisation's claim had already been filed with the Liquidator. The Liquidator and Provident Fund Authorities objected to the application's maintainability. The court considered the situation where the applicant's bank facilities were attached, preventing the payment of workers' wages.
Daaksh Jute LLP filed IA/849(KB)2021 against the attachment of their ODCC account (no. 50200055570842) maintained with HDFC Bank Ltd., Liluah Branch, Howrah. The attachment was done by R-1 and R-2. The applicant also has a current account (no. 50200054829521). The applicant sought a declaration that the notice dated 21/09/2021 is illegal because the Employees Provident Fund Organisation's claim was already filed with the Liquidator. The Liquidator and Provident Fund Authorities objected to the maintainability of the application, citing section 60(5) of the Code. The applicant relied on an operating Lease Agreement dated 01/08/2016. The attachment of the bank account prevented the payment of workers' wages, causing potential hardship. The court issued an interim order
…Date of the operating…
Date of the impugned…