The case involves an application (CA No.66/2020) dated 28.01.2020 in a corporate insolvency resolution process (CIRP) under the I&B Code. The applicant sought the appointment of Sh. Sumit Shukla as the Resolution Professional. The matter was heard through video conferencing.
The matter pertains to IA NO.112/2020 & CA NO.66/2020 IN CP No.(IB)355/ALD/2019. Sh. Ankur Kumar, Advocate, moved an application (CA No.66/2020) dated 28.01.2020 seeking the appointment of Sh. Sumit Shukla as the Resolution Professional in the ongoing I&B proceeding. Sh. Zain Abbas, Advocate, representing the IRP, stated no objection to the appointment, provided any outstanding dues to the IRP are considered and paid by the CoC. The CoC had already approved the appointment of Sh. Sumit Shukla with 100% voting shares. The proceedings had been pending for a considerable time.
Sign in to view the parties.
CA No.66/2020 filed on 28.01.2020 seeking…
Hearing conducted…
Sign in to view related legal provisions.
The case involves an application (CA No.66/2020) dated 28.01.2020 in a corporate insolvency resolution process (CIRP) under the I&B Code. The applicant sought the appointment of Sh. Sumit Shukla as the Resolution Professional. The matter was heard through video conferencing.
The matter pertains to IA NO.112/2020 & CA NO.66/2020 IN CP No.(IB)355/ALD/2019. Sh. Ankur Kumar, Advocate, moved an application (CA No.66/2020) dated 28.01.2020 seeking the appointment of Sh. Sumit Shukla as the Resolution Professional in the ongoing I&B proceeding. Sh. Zain Abbas, Advocate, representing the IRP, stated no objection to the appointment, provided any outstanding dues to the IRP are considered and paid by the CoC. The CoC had already approved the appointment of Sh. Sumit Shukla with 100% voting shares. The proceedings had been pending for a considerable time.
CA No.66/2020 filed on 28.01.2020 seeking…
Hearing conducted…
Sign in to view related legal provisions.