The case involves a Company Petition filed under Section 9 of the Insolvency & Bankruptcy Code, 2016, by the petitioner against the Corporate Debtor. The petitioner claimed that the Corporate Debtor defaulted on payments for a proforma invoice dated 2017-12-11, which was raised by the Operational Creditor based on a franchisee agreement allegedly entered into on the same day. The petitioner sought initiation of the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process against the Corporate Debtor.
Super Fight Promotions Pvt Ltd filed a Company Petition against Transend & Advantage Sports Pvt Ltd under Section 9 of the Insolvency & Bankruptcy Code, 2016, claiming default on a proforma invoice (No.SFL/17-18/Proforma-10) dated 2017-12-11. This invoice was allegedly raised in furtherance of a franchisee agreement purportedly entered into between the parties on the same day. The petitioner sought to initiate the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) against the Corporate Debtor. The court noted that the claim was based solely on the proforma invoice and that no evidence was presented to show that the agreement had been executed or that the invoice was for services rendered. The invoice amount was ₹1,88,80,000.
Sign in to view the parties.
Proforma Invoice…
Franchisee agreement allegedly entered into…
The case involves a Company Petition filed under Section 9 of the Insolvency & Bankruptcy Code, 2016, by the petitioner against the Corporate Debtor. The petitioner claimed that the Corporate Debtor defaulted on payments for a proforma invoice dated 2017-12-11, which was raised by the Operational Creditor based on a franchisee agreement allegedly entered into on the same day. The petitioner sought initiation of the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process against the Corporate Debtor.
Super Fight Promotions Pvt Ltd filed a Company Petition against Transend & Advantage Sports Pvt Ltd under Section 9 of the Insolvency & Bankruptcy Code, 2016, claiming default on a proforma invoice (No.SFL/17-18/Proforma-10) dated 2017-12-11. This invoice was allegedly raised in furtherance of a franchisee agreement purportedly entered into between the parties on the same day. The petitioner sought to initiate the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) against the Corporate Debtor. The court noted that the claim was based solely on the proforma invoice and that no evidence was presented to show that the agreement had been executed or that the invoice was for services rendered. The invoice amount was ₹1,88,80,000.
Proforma Invoice…
Franchisee agreement allegedly entered into…