The case involves multiple Interlocutory Applications (IAs) filed in the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT), New Delhi Bench, related to an insolvency case under Section 9 of the IBC Code, 2016. These IAs pertain to issues such as delays in claim filing, requests for early hearings, and submissions related to the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP). The Resolution Professional (RP) is involved in several of these applications. The court is addressing these IAs in the context of the CIRP and the approved resolution plan.
Vijaya Purohit filed an application against M/s. Trading Engineers (International) Ltd under Section 9 of the IBC Code, 2016. Several IAs were filed in connection with this case, including IA/2067/2021, IA/2068/2021, I.A2205/2021, ΙΑ/875/2021, IA/5615/2020, IA/5630/2020, IA/3049/2020, IA/3122/2020, IA/3628/2020, IA/4128/2020, ΙΑ/3436/2020, IA/1272/2021 & IA/1295/2021. The CIRP had already expired in some cases, rendering the applications infructuous. In IA/3628/2020, the applicant sought condonation of a 336-day delay in filing a claim, which was beyond the 330-day period for CIRP completion. The Resolution Plan had already been approved by the COC. The court considered the decisions in Essar Steel India Limited Vs. Satish Kumar Gupta & Ors. and Jaypee
…Sign in to view the parties.
Order delive…
The matter is l…
The case involves multiple Interlocutory Applications (IAs) filed in the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT), New Delhi Bench, related to an insolvency case under Section 9 of the IBC Code, 2016. These IAs pertain to issues such as delays in claim filing, requests for early hearings, and submissions related to the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP). The Resolution Professional (RP) is involved in several of these applications. The court is addressing these IAs in the context of the CIRP and the approved resolution plan.
Vijaya Purohit filed an application against M/s. Trading Engineers (International) Ltd under Section 9 of the IBC Code, 2016. Several IAs were filed in connection with this case, including IA/2067/2021, IA/2068/2021, I.A2205/2021, ΙΑ/875/2021, IA/5615/2020, IA/5630/2020, IA/3049/2020, IA/3122/2020, IA/3628/2020, IA/4128/2020, ΙΑ/3436/2020, IA/1272/2021 & IA/1295/2021. The CIRP had already expired in some cases, rendering the applications infructuous. In IA/3628/2020, the applicant sought condonation of a 336-day delay in filing a claim, which was beyond the 330-day period for CIRP completion. The Resolution Plan had already been approved by the COC. The court considered the decisions in Essar Steel India Limited Vs. Satish Kumar Gupta & Ors. and Jaypee
…Order delive…
The matter is l…