The case involves two applications, IA(IB)/143/2020 and IA(IB)/145/2020, both filed in CP/39/IB/2018 by the same applicant. The first application seeks condonation of a 57-day delay in filing a claim form with the Resolution Professional (RP). The second application requests the RP to consider a claim dated 24.10.2019. The applicant claims they were not notified of the CIRP initiation by either the Corporate Debtor or the IRP. By the time the applicant became aware of the CIRP, the Resolution Plan had already been approved.
Gimpex Pvt Ltd filed two applications, IA(IB)/143/2020 and IA(IB)/145/2020, in CP/39/IB/2018, related to the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) of Tiffin's Barytes Asbestos & Paints Ltd. The first application sought condonation of a 57-day delay in filing a claim form. The second application requested the Resolution Professional (RP) to consider a claim dated 24.10.2019. The applicant claimed they were not notified about the CIRP initiation. The Resolution Plan had already been approved when the applicant became aware of the CIRP. The RP's counsel argued that a public notice had already been issued, serving as notice to all concerned. The Hon'ble NCLAT stayed the Resolution Plan. The applicant failed to lodge the claim with the RP within the specified
…Sign in to view the parties.
Filing of CP/39/IB/2018,…
Date of the claim filed…
The case involves two applications, IA(IB)/143/2020 and IA(IB)/145/2020, both filed in CP/39/IB/2018 by the same applicant. The first application seeks condonation of a 57-day delay in filing a claim form with the Resolution Professional (RP). The second application requests the RP to consider a claim dated 24.10.2019. The applicant claims they were not notified of the CIRP initiation by either the Corporate Debtor or the IRP. By the time the applicant became aware of the CIRP, the Resolution Plan had already been approved.
Gimpex Pvt Ltd filed two applications, IA(IB)/143/2020 and IA(IB)/145/2020, in CP/39/IB/2018, related to the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) of Tiffin's Barytes Asbestos & Paints Ltd. The first application sought condonation of a 57-day delay in filing a claim form. The second application requested the Resolution Professional (RP) to consider a claim dated 24.10.2019. The applicant claimed they were not notified about the CIRP initiation. The Resolution Plan had already been approved when the applicant became aware of the CIRP. The RP's counsel argued that a public notice had already been issued, serving as notice to all concerned. The Hon'ble NCLAT stayed the Resolution Plan. The applicant failed to lodge the claim with the RP within the specified
…Filing of CP/39/IB/2018,…
Date of the claim filed…