The case involves IA/175/KOB/2020 filed by the Corporate Debtor, Tharakan Web Innovations Pvt. Ltd., in IBA/34/KOB/2020 under Rule 32 of the NCLT Rules, 2016, seeking a declaration that IBA/34/KOB/2020 is not maintainable in light of Annexure A2 Notification. The Corporate Debtor argued that the Operational Creditor, Cyriac Njavally, filed an application under Section 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) prematurely. The Corporate Debtor contended that the mandatory 10-day period to object to the demand notice or repay the debt had not elapsed when the Operational Creditor filed the application. The Corporate Debtor also argued that the initial IB Application served was incomplete and that the date of filing was different from the date on the application.
…M/s Tharakan Web Innovations Pvt. Ltd. is the Corporate Debtor. Cyriac Njavally is the Operational Creditor. The Corporate Debtor filed IA/175/KOB/2020 in IBA/34/KOB/2020 seeking a declaration that IBA/34/KOB/2020 is not maintainable. A Form 3 Demand Notice dated 25.02.2020 was issued under Rule 8 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code 2016 and was received by the Corporate Debtor on 02.03.2020. The Operational Creditor filed an application under Section 9 of the IBC. The Corporate Debtor had time until 12.03.2020 to file a reply disputing the demand. The initial IB Application served on the Corporate Debtor was received on 12.06.2020 and contained blank dates. A filled-in copy of the application was served to the Counsel for the Applicant, showing the date of the
…Sign in to view the parties.
Form 3 Demand Notice dated 25.02.2020 was…
The Demand Notice was…
The case involves IA/175/KOB/2020 filed by the Corporate Debtor, Tharakan Web Innovations Pvt. Ltd., in IBA/34/KOB/2020 under Rule 32 of the NCLT Rules, 2016, seeking a declaration that IBA/34/KOB/2020 is not maintainable in light of Annexure A2 Notification. The Corporate Debtor argued that the Operational Creditor, Cyriac Njavally, filed an application under Section 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) prematurely. The Corporate Debtor contended that the mandatory 10-day period to object to the demand notice or repay the debt had not elapsed when the Operational Creditor filed the application. The Corporate Debtor also argued that the initial IB Application served was incomplete and that the date of filing was different from the date on the application.
…M/s Tharakan Web Innovations Pvt. Ltd. is the Corporate Debtor. Cyriac Njavally is the Operational Creditor. The Corporate Debtor filed IA/175/KOB/2020 in IBA/34/KOB/2020 seeking a declaration that IBA/34/KOB/2020 is not maintainable. A Form 3 Demand Notice dated 25.02.2020 was issued under Rule 8 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code 2016 and was received by the Corporate Debtor on 02.03.2020. The Operational Creditor filed an application under Section 9 of the IBC. The Corporate Debtor had time until 12.03.2020 to file a reply disputing the demand. The initial IB Application served on the Corporate Debtor was received on 12.06.2020 and contained blank dates. A filled-in copy of the application was served to the Counsel for the Applicant, showing the date of the
…Form 3 Demand Notice dated 25.02.2020 was…
The Demand Notice was…