M/s. Arihant Aluminium Corporation filed C.P.(IB) No.419/BB/2019 under Section 9 of the IBC, 2016, seeking to initiate Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) against M/s. Techno Sales Corporation Private Limited, alleging a default of Rs.4,08,849/-. The case was listed for admissions on multiple dates, but was adjourned each time at the petitioner's request for reasons such as serving notice and exploring settlement.
M/s. Arihant Aluminium Corporation, the operational creditor, filed C.P.(IB) No.419/BB/2019 under Section 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC), 2016, against M/s. Techno Sales Corporation Private Limited, the corporate debtor, seeking to initiate the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP). The basis for the petition was a default of Rs.4,08,849/-. The case was listed for admission on several dates, but adjourned at the petitioner's request. Eventually, the parties settled the matter outside court, and the petitioner sought to withdraw the petition. The relevance of these facts lies in demonstrating the initiation of insolvency proceedings, the subsequent settlement, and the eventual withdrawal of the petition before admission.
Sign in to view the parties.
The case was i…
The case was li…
M/s. Arihant Aluminium Corporation filed C.P.(IB) No.419/BB/2019 under Section 9 of the IBC, 2016, seeking to initiate Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) against M/s. Techno Sales Corporation Private Limited, alleging a default of Rs.4,08,849/-. The case was listed for admissions on multiple dates, but was adjourned each time at the petitioner's request for reasons such as serving notice and exploring settlement.
M/s. Arihant Aluminium Corporation, the operational creditor, filed C.P.(IB) No.419/BB/2019 under Section 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC), 2016, against M/s. Techno Sales Corporation Private Limited, the corporate debtor, seeking to initiate the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP). The basis for the petition was a default of Rs.4,08,849/-. The case was listed for admission on several dates, but adjourned at the petitioner's request. Eventually, the parties settled the matter outside court, and the petitioner sought to withdraw the petition. The relevance of these facts lies in demonstrating the initiation of insolvency proceedings, the subsequent settlement, and the eventual withdrawal of the petition before admission.
The case was i…
The case was li…