The case involves a company petition/application with the number CP (IB) No. 89/9/HDB/2021. The petitioner is DRB Infrastructure Pvt Ltd, and the respondent is Sushee Infra and Mining Ltd. The case is filed under Section 9 of the IBC. Both the Operational Creditor and Corporate Debtor's counsels appeared and submitted that a settlement was arrived at.
The case involves a company petition, CP (IB) No. 89/9/HDB/2021, filed by DRB Infrastructure Pvt Ltd against Sushee Infra and Mining Ltd under Section 9 of the IBC. Both the Operational Creditor and Corporate Debtor appeared through their respective counsels. The key fact is that both parties submitted to the court that a settlement had been reached. Consequently, the Operational Creditor sought permission to withdraw the matter. The court granted this permission, disposing of the matter with the provision that it could be revived if the settlement fails. The relevance of the settlement is that it allows the parties to resolve the dispute outside of the formal insolvency proceedings, potentially leading to a more amicable and efficient resolution.
Sign in to view the parties.
Hearing held on 15.07.2021 at 10:30 AM where…
The case involves a company petition/application with the number CP (IB) No. 89/9/HDB/2021. The petitioner is DRB Infrastructure Pvt Ltd, and the respondent is Sushee Infra and Mining Ltd. The case is filed under Section 9 of the IBC. Both the Operational Creditor and Corporate Debtor's counsels appeared and submitted that a settlement was arrived at.
The case involves a company petition, CP (IB) No. 89/9/HDB/2021, filed by DRB Infrastructure Pvt Ltd against Sushee Infra and Mining Ltd under Section 9 of the IBC. Both the Operational Creditor and Corporate Debtor appeared through their respective counsels. The key fact is that both parties submitted to the court that a settlement had been reached. Consequently, the Operational Creditor sought permission to withdraw the matter. The court granted this permission, disposing of the matter with the provision that it could be revived if the settlement fails. The relevance of the settlement is that it allows the parties to resolve the dispute outside of the formal insolvency proceedings, potentially leading to a more amicable and efficient resolution.
Hearing held on 15.07.2021 at 10:30 AM where…