The case pertains to a Company Petition (CP(IB) No. 210/9/AMR/2019) filed under Section 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC). The matter was presented before the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT), Amaravati Bench, with Hon'ble Shri Bhaskara Pantula Mohan presiding as the Member Judicial. The case involves A.R Enterprises as the petitioner and Sudalagunta Sugars Ltd as both the company and the respondent.
The central fact is that A.R Enterprises, as the Operational Creditor, initiated a Company Petition (CP(IB) No. 210/9/AMR/2019) against Sudalagunta Sugars Ltd under Section 9 of the IBC. However, the Operational Creditor subsequently filed a memo, which led to the NCLT dismissing the petition as withdrawn. The filing of the memo by the Operational Creditor is a key fact, suggesting a change in circumstances or strategy that prompted the withdrawal of the petition. The dismissal of the petition is the final outcome of the case.
Sign in to view the parties.
Hearing he…
Operational C…
The case pertains to a Company Petition (CP(IB) No. 210/9/AMR/2019) filed under Section 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC). The matter was presented before the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT), Amaravati Bench, with Hon'ble Shri Bhaskara Pantula Mohan presiding as the Member Judicial. The case involves A.R Enterprises as the petitioner and Sudalagunta Sugars Ltd as both the company and the respondent.
The central fact is that A.R Enterprises, as the Operational Creditor, initiated a Company Petition (CP(IB) No. 210/9/AMR/2019) against Sudalagunta Sugars Ltd under Section 9 of the IBC. However, the Operational Creditor subsequently filed a memo, which led to the NCLT dismissing the petition as withdrawn. The filing of the memo by the Operational Creditor is a key fact, suggesting a change in circumstances or strategy that prompted the withdrawal of the petition. The dismissal of the petition is the final outcome of the case.
Hearing he…
Operational C…