The case involves a petition filed by the State Bank of India against M Laxmi Prasanna & Vishwa Infrastructures And Services Pvt Ltd under Section 95 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC), 2016. The petitioner requested the Tribunal to appoint an Interim Resolution Professional (IRP).
State Bank of India filed a petition against M Laxmi Prasanna & Vishwa Infrastructures And Services Pvt Ltd under Section 95 of the IBC, 2016. The petitioner requested the appointment of an IRP. The Tribunal found Mr. Kiran Kumar Manikkwar suitable for the role as his name was present in the IBBI database. The order imposed an interim moratorium, staying legal actions against the debtor and preventing creditors from initiating new actions. The petitioner is responsible for the expenses incurred by the RP and must notify the respondent. The case was adjourned to 2022-01-12.
Sign in to view the parties.
Hearing held on…
Mr. Kiran Kumar…
The case involves a petition filed by the State Bank of India against M Laxmi Prasanna & Vishwa Infrastructures And Services Pvt Ltd under Section 95 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC), 2016. The petitioner requested the Tribunal to appoint an Interim Resolution Professional (IRP).
State Bank of India filed a petition against M Laxmi Prasanna & Vishwa Infrastructures And Services Pvt Ltd under Section 95 of the IBC, 2016. The petitioner requested the appointment of an IRP. The Tribunal found Mr. Kiran Kumar Manikkwar suitable for the role as his name was present in the IBBI database. The order imposed an interim moratorium, staying legal actions against the debtor and preventing creditors from initiating new actions. The petitioner is responsible for the expenses incurred by the RP and must notify the respondent. The case was adjourned to 2022-01-12.
Hearing held on…
Mr. Kiran Kumar…