The State Bank of India, as the petitioner, filed a case against K Supriya & Vishwa Infrastructures And Services Pvt Ltd, the respondents, under Section 95 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC), 2016. The Tribunal is considering the appointment of an Interim Resolution Professional (IRP).
The State Bank of India filed a petition under Section 95 of the IBC, 2016 against K Supriya & Vishwa Infrastructures And Services Pvt Ltd. The petitioner requested the Tribunal to appoint an IRP. The Tribunal appointed Mr. Kiran Kumar Manikkwar as the IRP, noting his presence on the IBBI database. An interim moratorium was imposed as per Section 96 of the IBC, staying legal actions against the debtor and preventing creditors from initiating new actions. The petitioner is responsible for the expenses of the RP and must notify the respondent. The case was adjourned to 2022-01-12.
Sign in to view the parties.
Hearing held on…
Mr. Kiran Kumar…
The State Bank of India, as the petitioner, filed a case against K Supriya & Vishwa Infrastructures And Services Pvt Ltd, the respondents, under Section 95 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC), 2016. The Tribunal is considering the appointment of an Interim Resolution Professional (IRP).
The State Bank of India filed a petition under Section 95 of the IBC, 2016 against K Supriya & Vishwa Infrastructures And Services Pvt Ltd. The petitioner requested the Tribunal to appoint an IRP. The Tribunal appointed Mr. Kiran Kumar Manikkwar as the IRP, noting his presence on the IBBI database. An interim moratorium was imposed as per Section 96 of the IBC, staying legal actions against the debtor and preventing creditors from initiating new actions. The petitioner is responsible for the expenses of the RP and must notify the respondent. The case was adjourned to 2022-01-12.
Hearing held on…
Mr. Kiran Kumar…