The case involves an application under Section 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC), 2016, filed by Ram Charan Company Pvt Ltd, an operational creditor, against Stallion Tyres Ltd, the corporate debtor. The operational creditor sought initiation of the corporate insolvency resolution process against the corporate debtor. The petition was filed before the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT), Hyderabad Bench.
Ram Charan Company Pvt Ltd, an operational creditor, filed a petition under Section 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, against Stallion Tyres Ltd, the corporate debtor, before the NCLT Hyderabad. The operational creditor claimed that the corporate debtor had defaulted on payments. During the proceedings, the operational creditor and the corporate debtor reached a settlement. The corporate debtor made the payment to the operational creditor. Consequently, the operational creditor filed a withdrawal memo, stating that they had received the payment. The petition was not yet admitted by the NCLT when the withdrawal request was made. The NCLT considered the withdrawal request and the fact that the claim had been settled.
Sign in to view the parties.
Hearing he…
Hearing held and order passed on 06.03.2019.…
Sign in to view related legal provisions.
The case involves an application under Section 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC), 2016, filed by Ram Charan Company Pvt Ltd, an operational creditor, against Stallion Tyres Ltd, the corporate debtor. The operational creditor sought initiation of the corporate insolvency resolution process against the corporate debtor. The petition was filed before the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT), Hyderabad Bench.
Ram Charan Company Pvt Ltd, an operational creditor, filed a petition under Section 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, against Stallion Tyres Ltd, the corporate debtor, before the NCLT Hyderabad. The operational creditor claimed that the corporate debtor had defaulted on payments. During the proceedings, the operational creditor and the corporate debtor reached a settlement. The corporate debtor made the payment to the operational creditor. Consequently, the operational creditor filed a withdrawal memo, stating that they had received the payment. The petition was not yet admitted by the NCLT when the withdrawal request was made. The NCLT considered the withdrawal request and the fact that the claim had been settled.
Hearing he…
Hearing held and order passed on 06.03.2019.…
Sign in to view related legal provisions.