The case involves an application (MA/484/2019) in relation to a corporate insolvency resolution process (CP/762/IB/2018). The Resolution Professional and the Counsel for the Resolution Applicant are present. The Counsel for the State Tax Officer is also present. An ex parte order dated 18.06.2019 was previously set aside. The Counsel for TANGEDCO requested that an ex parte order dated 11.06.2019 against TANGEDCO be set aside, stating that the notice was received and referred to the Legal Department for consulting opinion, preventing TANGEDCO's appearance.
The Resolution Professional and their counsel, as well as the counsel for the Resolution Applicant, were present. The counsel for the State Tax Officer was also present. An earlier ex parte order dated 18.06.2019 had already been set aside. TANGEDCO's counsel requested the setting aside of an ex parte order dated 11.06.2019, explaining that the notice was received but referred to their Legal Department for consultation, preventing their appearance. The State Tax Department's counsel had appeared on 21.06.2019 and was directed to file an objection, but failed to do so. The court granted a final opportunity to the State Tax Department to file their objection by 28.06.2019.
Sign in to view the parties.
Ex parte order…
An ex parte ord…
The case involves an application (MA/484/2019) in relation to a corporate insolvency resolution process (CP/762/IB/2018). The Resolution Professional and the Counsel for the Resolution Applicant are present. The Counsel for the State Tax Officer is also present. An ex parte order dated 18.06.2019 was previously set aside. The Counsel for TANGEDCO requested that an ex parte order dated 11.06.2019 against TANGEDCO be set aside, stating that the notice was received and referred to the Legal Department for consulting opinion, preventing TANGEDCO's appearance.
The Resolution Professional and their counsel, as well as the counsel for the Resolution Applicant, were present. The counsel for the State Tax Officer was also present. An earlier ex parte order dated 18.06.2019 had already been set aside. TANGEDCO's counsel requested the setting aside of an ex parte order dated 11.06.2019, explaining that the notice was received but referred to their Legal Department for consultation, preventing their appearance. The State Tax Department's counsel had appeared on 21.06.2019 and was directed to file an objection, but failed to do so. The court granted a final opportunity to the State Tax Department to file their objection by 28.06.2019.
Ex parte order…
An ex parte ord…