The case involves a petition under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC). The petitioner sought to withdraw the petition based on a settlement deed reached with the respondent. The settlement deed was dated 2021-06-30. The petitioner requested permission to withdraw the petition with the liberty to file a fresh petition if the corporate debtor violates the terms and conditions of the settlement deed.
The petitioner, Samunnati Agro Solutions Pvt Ltd, filed a petition (IBA/1368/2019) against the respondent, SR Marine Foods Pvt Ltd, under Section 9 Rule 6 of the IBC, 2016. The parties subsequently arrived at a compromise, documented in a Settlement Deed dated 2021-06-30. Based on this settlement, the petitioner sought permission to withdraw the petition, reserving the right to refile if the respondent (Corporate Debtor) failed to adhere to the terms of the Settlement Deed. The court considered this compromise as a valid basis for withdrawal, indicating that the parties had reached an agreement to resolve the matter outside of the formal insolvency process. The key fact is the existence of the Settlement Deed, which formed the basis for the petitioner's request to
…Sign in to view the parties.
Parties arriv…
Hearing held on…
Sign in to view related legal provisions.
The case involves a petition under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC). The petitioner sought to withdraw the petition based on a settlement deed reached with the respondent. The settlement deed was dated 2021-06-30. The petitioner requested permission to withdraw the petition with the liberty to file a fresh petition if the corporate debtor violates the terms and conditions of the settlement deed.
The petitioner, Samunnati Agro Solutions Pvt Ltd, filed a petition (IBA/1368/2019) against the respondent, SR Marine Foods Pvt Ltd, under Section 9 Rule 6 of the IBC, 2016. The parties subsequently arrived at a compromise, documented in a Settlement Deed dated 2021-06-30. Based on this settlement, the petitioner sought permission to withdraw the petition, reserving the right to refile if the respondent (Corporate Debtor) failed to adhere to the terms of the Settlement Deed. The court considered this compromise as a valid basis for withdrawal, indicating that the parties had reached an agreement to resolve the matter outside of the formal insolvency process. The key fact is the existence of the Settlement Deed, which formed the basis for the petitioner's request to
…Parties arriv…
Hearing held on…
Sign in to view related legal provisions.