The case involves an MA filed under Section 60(5) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, by the Administrator of the Specified Undertaking of the Unit Trust of India (SUUTI), a financial creditor, challenging the rejection of its claim of ₹31.50 Crores by the Resolution Professional. The rejection was based on the claim being time-barred. The Corporate Debtor, Solidaire India Limited, had availed a loan facility from SUUTI and ICICI Bank. ICICI Bank later assigned its debt to M/s. International Asset Reconstruction Company (IARC). A charge was created with the RoC in 1989. In 1997, the matter went for reference before BIFR, which was rejected by AIFR. The Corporate Debtor then filed a Writ Petition before the Delhi High Court, which was initially stayed but later
…The Administrator of the Specified Undertaking of the Unit Trust of India (SUUTI) filed an application challenging the rejection of its claim of ₹31.50 Crores by the Resolution Professional (RP) of Solidaire India Limited. The RP rejected the claim on the ground that it was time-barred. Solidaire India Limited had availed a loan facility from SUUTI and ICICI Bank. ICICI Bank assigned its debt to M/s. International Asset Reconstruction Company (IARC). A charge was created with the RoC in 1989. The matter was previously referred to BIFR, which was rejected by AIFR, leading to a Writ Petition before the Delhi High Court, which was eventually dismissed. ICICI Bank initiated action under Section 13(2) of the SARFAESI Act after obtaining consent from UTI under Section 3(9)
…Sign in to view the parties.
A charge was created…
The matter we…
The case involves an MA filed under Section 60(5) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, by the Administrator of the Specified Undertaking of the Unit Trust of India (SUUTI), a financial creditor, challenging the rejection of its claim of ₹31.50 Crores by the Resolution Professional. The rejection was based on the claim being time-barred. The Corporate Debtor, Solidaire India Limited, had availed a loan facility from SUUTI and ICICI Bank. ICICI Bank later assigned its debt to M/s. International Asset Reconstruction Company (IARC). A charge was created with the RoC in 1989. In 1997, the matter went for reference before BIFR, which was rejected by AIFR. The Corporate Debtor then filed a Writ Petition before the Delhi High Court, which was initially stayed but later
…The Administrator of the Specified Undertaking of the Unit Trust of India (SUUTI) filed an application challenging the rejection of its claim of ₹31.50 Crores by the Resolution Professional (RP) of Solidaire India Limited. The RP rejected the claim on the ground that it was time-barred. Solidaire India Limited had availed a loan facility from SUUTI and ICICI Bank. ICICI Bank assigned its debt to M/s. International Asset Reconstruction Company (IARC). A charge was created with the RoC in 1989. The matter was previously referred to BIFR, which was rejected by AIFR, leading to a Writ Petition before the Delhi High Court, which was eventually dismissed. ICICI Bank initiated action under Section 13(2) of the SARFAESI Act after obtaining consent from UTI under Section 3(9)
…A charge was created…
The matter we…