M/s. JCDecaux Advertising India Pvt. Ltd. filed C.P.(IB)No.237/BB/2019 under Section 9 of the IBC, 2016, seeking to initiate Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) against M/s. Skylark Arcadia Private Limited, the Corporate Debtor, due to a default in payment of Rs. 30,12,692/-. The case was listed for hearing on multiple dates between July and August 2019.
M/s. JCDecaux Advertising India Pvt. Ltd. initiated Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) against M/s. Skylark Arcadia Private Limited under Section 9 of the IBC, 2016, claiming a default of Rs. 30,12,692/-. The case was registered as C.P.(IB)No.237/BB/2019. The matter was listed for hearing on multiple occasions, specifically on 02.07.2019, 15.07.2019, 16.07.2019, 30.07.2019, 09.08.2019, 16.08.2019, and 29.08.2019. However, neither the petitioner nor their counsel appeared before the Tribunal on 16.08.2019 and 29.08.2019. Due to the petitioner's absence, the case was posted for dismissal on 29.08.2019. On this date, no one appeared for the petitioner, leading the Tribunal to conclude that the petitioner was not interested in prosecuting the case.
Sign in to view the parties.
Case liste…
Case liste…
M/s. JCDecaux Advertising India Pvt. Ltd. filed C.P.(IB)No.237/BB/2019 under Section 9 of the IBC, 2016, seeking to initiate Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) against M/s. Skylark Arcadia Private Limited, the Corporate Debtor, due to a default in payment of Rs. 30,12,692/-. The case was listed for hearing on multiple dates between July and August 2019.
M/s. JCDecaux Advertising India Pvt. Ltd. initiated Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) against M/s. Skylark Arcadia Private Limited under Section 9 of the IBC, 2016, claiming a default of Rs. 30,12,692/-. The case was registered as C.P.(IB)No.237/BB/2019. The matter was listed for hearing on multiple occasions, specifically on 02.07.2019, 15.07.2019, 16.07.2019, 30.07.2019, 09.08.2019, 16.08.2019, and 29.08.2019. However, neither the petitioner nor their counsel appeared before the Tribunal on 16.08.2019 and 29.08.2019. Due to the petitioner's absence, the case was posted for dismissal on 29.08.2019. On this date, no one appeared for the petitioner, leading the Tribunal to conclude that the petitioner was not interested in prosecuting the case.
Case liste…
Case liste…