The case involves Manvender Singh Malik V/s M/s Shri Narshing Dev Sugar Pvt Ltd. The hearing was held on 07.02.2019. Sh. Vipin Kushwaha, Advocate, along with Ms. Babita Jain, RP, represented the petitioner, while Sh. Anil Kumar, PCS, represented the respondent. The PCS appearing for the Suspended Director stated that the remaining part of the Creditor's Ledger had been supplied to the Resolution Professional (RP), who acknowledged it. The court noted that the Suspended Directors had complied with all the documents required by the RP. Consequently, application CA 2/19 was disposed of as unnecessary. This suggests that the compliance of the suspended directors with the RP's requirements led to the resolution of the issue at hand.

The case involves Manvender Singh Malik V/s M/s Shri Narshing Dev Sugar Pvt Ltd. The hearing was held on 07.02.2019. Sh. Vipin Kushwaha, Advocate, along with Ms. Babita Jain, RP, represented the petitioner, while Sh. Anil Kumar, PCS, represented the respondent. The PCS appearing for the Suspended Director stated that the remaining part of the Creditor's Ledger had been supplied to the Resolution Professional (RP), who acknowledged it. The court noted that the Suspended Directors had complied with all the documents required by the RP. Consequently, application CA 2/19 was disposed of as unnecessary. This suggests that the compliance of the suspended directors with the RP's requirements led to the resolution of the issue at hand.