The case involves an application filed by the Interim Resolution Professional (IRP) seeking relief for withdrawing his appointment due to non-cooperation from the Operational Creditor and non-compliance with the Tribunal's order. The IRP also requested action against the Operational Creditor for disobeying the Tribunal's order and compensation for the time spent processing the case.
M Murugesan, the Interim Resolution Professional (IRP) of M/s Selathaar Tanning Industries Pvt Ltd, filed an application (IA(IBC)/414/CHE/2021 in IBA/83/2020) seeking to withdraw his appointment due to the Operational Creditor, Jamallur Razack Sakkira Bannu & Others, not cooperating and not complying with the Tribunal's orders. The IRP also sought action against the Operational Creditor for disobedience and compensation for his time spent on the case. The Operational Creditor did not respond to notices, oral communications, or messages from the IRP, and their counsel did not appear before the Tribunal. This caused financial and mental difficulties for the IRP, including unpaid expenses. The Tribunal observed the non-cooperation and imposed costs on the Operational
…Sign in to view the parties.
Hearing held on…
Matter list…
The case involves an application filed by the Interim Resolution Professional (IRP) seeking relief for withdrawing his appointment due to non-cooperation from the Operational Creditor and non-compliance with the Tribunal's order. The IRP also requested action against the Operational Creditor for disobeying the Tribunal's order and compensation for the time spent processing the case.
M Murugesan, the Interim Resolution Professional (IRP) of M/s Selathaar Tanning Industries Pvt Ltd, filed an application (IA(IBC)/414/CHE/2021 in IBA/83/2020) seeking to withdraw his appointment due to the Operational Creditor, Jamallur Razack Sakkira Bannu & Others, not cooperating and not complying with the Tribunal's orders. The IRP also sought action against the Operational Creditor for disobedience and compensation for his time spent on the case. The Operational Creditor did not respond to notices, oral communications, or messages from the IRP, and their counsel did not appear before the Tribunal. This caused financial and mental difficulties for the IRP, including unpaid expenses. The Tribunal observed the non-cooperation and imposed costs on the Operational
…Hearing held on…
Matter list…