The case pertains to CA No. 313/2019 in CP (IB) No.56/Chd/Hry/2018, an admitted matter under Section 66 & 67 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016. The matter involves M/s PAN Chemicals Inc. as the operational creditor and M/s Sainath Texport Ltd. as the respondent-corporate debtor. Vikas Garg, the liquidator, is the applicant, and Mr. Satyaveer Kothari, Director & Ors., are the respondents.
M/s PAN Chemicals Inc., through its proprietor Ramji Lal, filed an application against M/s Sainath Texport Ltd., the corporate debtor. The application was filed under Section 66 & 67 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016. The Liquidator, Vikas Garg, is the applicant. The court noted that the application had been served to the alleged defaulters, but no reply was filed, and no one was present for the respondents. The court directed the issuance of notice to the respondents to show cause why they should not be held liable under Section 66 and 67 of the IBC for committing default as communicated after forensic audit. The applicant is directed to serve the notice and file an affidavit of service.
Sign in to view the parties.
Corporate Ins…
Court directs notice to…
The case pertains to CA No. 313/2019 in CP (IB) No.56/Chd/Hry/2018, an admitted matter under Section 66 & 67 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016. The matter involves M/s PAN Chemicals Inc. as the operational creditor and M/s Sainath Texport Ltd. as the respondent-corporate debtor. Vikas Garg, the liquidator, is the applicant, and Mr. Satyaveer Kothari, Director & Ors., are the respondents.
M/s PAN Chemicals Inc., through its proprietor Ramji Lal, filed an application against M/s Sainath Texport Ltd., the corporate debtor. The application was filed under Section 66 & 67 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016. The Liquidator, Vikas Garg, is the applicant. The court noted that the application had been served to the alleged defaulters, but no reply was filed, and no one was present for the respondents. The court directed the issuance of notice to the respondents to show cause why they should not be held liable under Section 66 and 67 of the IBC for committing default as communicated after forensic audit. The applicant is directed to serve the notice and file an affidavit of service.
Corporate Ins…
Court directs notice to…