The case involves an application filed by the Interim Resolution Professional (IRP) appointed by the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) to initiate the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) against a Corporate Debtor. The CIRP was initiated based on a petition filed by the Operational Creditor. Subsequently, the Operational Creditor and the Corporate Debtor amicably settled the matter, leading to a Memorandum of Settlement (MoS) being entered into between them on 2020-05-19. Form-FA, as required under Regulation 30A of the Insolvency & Bankruptcy Board of India (Insolvency Resolution Process for Corporate Debtor) Regulations, 2016, was lodged by the Operational Creditor seeking withdrawal of the CIRP.
The Interim Resolution Professional (IRP) filed an application to initiate Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) against a Corporate Debtor. The CIRP was initiated based on a petition filed by the Operational Creditor. After the initiation of CIRP, the Operational Creditor and the Corporate Debtor reached an amicable settlement, entering into a Memorandum of Settlement (MoS) on 2020-05-19. The Operational Creditor then lodged Form-FA, seeking withdrawal of the CIRP. The IRP informed the Tribunal that a Committee of Creditors (CoC) had not been constituted and that all fees and expenses payable to the IRP had been fully met by the Operational Creditor. The Tribunal considered the settlement, the absence of a CoC, and the payment of IRP fees.
Sign in to view the parties.
Hearing of Chennai…
Order dated 2020-05-08…
Sign in to view related legal provisions.
The case involves an application filed by the Interim Resolution Professional (IRP) appointed by the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) to initiate the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) against a Corporate Debtor. The CIRP was initiated based on a petition filed by the Operational Creditor. Subsequently, the Operational Creditor and the Corporate Debtor amicably settled the matter, leading to a Memorandum of Settlement (MoS) being entered into between them on 2020-05-19. Form-FA, as required under Regulation 30A of the Insolvency & Bankruptcy Board of India (Insolvency Resolution Process for Corporate Debtor) Regulations, 2016, was lodged by the Operational Creditor seeking withdrawal of the CIRP.
The Interim Resolution Professional (IRP) filed an application to initiate Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) against a Corporate Debtor. The CIRP was initiated based on a petition filed by the Operational Creditor. After the initiation of CIRP, the Operational Creditor and the Corporate Debtor reached an amicable settlement, entering into a Memorandum of Settlement (MoS) on 2020-05-19. The Operational Creditor then lodged Form-FA, seeking withdrawal of the CIRP. The IRP informed the Tribunal that a Committee of Creditors (CoC) had not been constituted and that all fees and expenses payable to the IRP had been fully met by the Operational Creditor. The Tribunal considered the settlement, the absence of a CoC, and the payment of IRP fees.
Hearing of Chennai…
Order dated 2020-05-08…
Sign in to view related legal provisions.