The case involves a petition under Section 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016. The petitioner sought to withdraw the petition. The counsel for the petitioner submitted that a joint confirmation letter was executed by the parties and a settlement deed was entered into between them, indicating an amicable settlement.
Mr. Shavez Mukri, Advocate, appeared for the Petitioner and sought to withdraw the Petition. The Counsel for the Petitioner submitted that there is a joint confirmation letter executed by the parties and a settlement deed entered into between the parties. The counsel further submitted that the matter has been amicably settled between the parties. Based on these submissions, the court dismissed the petition as not pressed. The key fact is the amicable settlement between the parties, leading to the withdrawal of the petition.
Sign in to view the parties.
Order sheet of the…
Mr. Shavez Mukri, Advocate, appeared for the…
Sign in to view related legal provisions.
The case involves a petition under Section 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016. The petitioner sought to withdraw the petition. The counsel for the petitioner submitted that a joint confirmation letter was executed by the parties and a settlement deed was entered into between them, indicating an amicable settlement.
Mr. Shavez Mukri, Advocate, appeared for the Petitioner and sought to withdraw the Petition. The Counsel for the Petitioner submitted that there is a joint confirmation letter executed by the parties and a settlement deed entered into between the parties. The counsel further submitted that the matter has been amicably settled between the parties. Based on these submissions, the court dismissed the petition as not pressed. The key fact is the amicable settlement between the parties, leading to the withdrawal of the petition.
Order sheet of the…
Mr. Shavez Mukri, Advocate, appeared for the…
Sign in to view related legal provisions.