M/s.Magnifico Minerals Private Limited filed C.P.(IB)No.177/BB/2019 under Section 9 of the IBC, 2016, seeking to initiate the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) against M/s.Ratna Cements (Yadwad) Limited, alleging a default. The case was listed for admission on multiple dates and adjourned at the request of the parties. The petitioner sought to withdraw the petition with the liberty to file a fresh petition if the respondent failed to honor the settlement.
M/s.Magnifico Minerals Private Limited, the operational creditor, filed a petition under Section 9 of the IBC, 2016, to initiate CIRP against M/s.Ratna Cements (Yadwad) Limited, the corporate debtor, due to an alleged default of Rs.30,35,884.22 as of 2018-06-14. The case was listed for admission on several dates and adjourned each time at the request of the parties. Subsequently, the parties reached a settlement, and the petitioner filed a memo for withdrawal, stating that the corporate debtor agreed to pay the outstanding amount, with part payment made via demand draft and a debit note issued for the remaining balance. The petitioner sought to withdraw the petition with the liberty to file a fresh petition if the respondent failed to honor the settlement terms. The
…Sign in to view the parties.
The alleged date of…
Case liste…
Sign in to view related legal provisions.
M/s.Magnifico Minerals Private Limited filed C.P.(IB)No.177/BB/2019 under Section 9 of the IBC, 2016, seeking to initiate the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) against M/s.Ratna Cements (Yadwad) Limited, alleging a default. The case was listed for admission on multiple dates and adjourned at the request of the parties. The petitioner sought to withdraw the petition with the liberty to file a fresh petition if the respondent failed to honor the settlement.
M/s.Magnifico Minerals Private Limited, the operational creditor, filed a petition under Section 9 of the IBC, 2016, to initiate CIRP against M/s.Ratna Cements (Yadwad) Limited, the corporate debtor, due to an alleged default of Rs.30,35,884.22 as of 2018-06-14. The case was listed for admission on several dates and adjourned each time at the request of the parties. Subsequently, the parties reached a settlement, and the petitioner filed a memo for withdrawal, stating that the corporate debtor agreed to pay the outstanding amount, with part payment made via demand draft and a debit note issued for the remaining balance. The petitioner sought to withdraw the petition with the liberty to file a fresh petition if the respondent failed to honor the settlement terms. The
…The alleged date of…
Case liste…
Sign in to view related legal provisions.