M/s.Magnifico Minerals Private Limited filed C.P.(IB)No.177/BB/2019 under Section 9 of the IBC, 2016, seeking to initiate the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) against M/s.Ratna Cements (Yadwad) Limited, alleging a default. The case was listed for admission on multiple dates and adjourned at the request of the parties. The petitioner sought to withdraw the petition with the liberty to file a fresh petition if the respondent failed to honor the settlement.
M/s.Magnifico Minerals Private Limited, the operational creditor/petitioner, filed a petition under Section 9 of the IBC, 2016, against M/s.Ratna Cements (Yadwad) Limited, the corporate debtor/respondent, alleging a default of Rs.30,35,884.22 as of 2018-06-14. The case was listed for admission on various dates and adjourned at the request of the parties. The petitioner sought to withdraw the petition based on a settlement. The corporate debtor agreed to pay the outstanding amount, with part payment made via demand draft and a debit note issued for the remaining balance, which was accepted by the petitioner. The key fact is the settlement between the parties leading to the withdrawal of the CIRP petition.
Sign in to view the parties.
The date on which the…
One of the dates the…
Sign in to view related legal provisions.
M/s.Magnifico Minerals Private Limited filed C.P.(IB)No.177/BB/2019 under Section 9 of the IBC, 2016, seeking to initiate the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) against M/s.Ratna Cements (Yadwad) Limited, alleging a default. The case was listed for admission on multiple dates and adjourned at the request of the parties. The petitioner sought to withdraw the petition with the liberty to file a fresh petition if the respondent failed to honor the settlement.
M/s.Magnifico Minerals Private Limited, the operational creditor/petitioner, filed a petition under Section 9 of the IBC, 2016, against M/s.Ratna Cements (Yadwad) Limited, the corporate debtor/respondent, alleging a default of Rs.30,35,884.22 as of 2018-06-14. The case was listed for admission on various dates and adjourned at the request of the parties. The petitioner sought to withdraw the petition based on a settlement. The corporate debtor agreed to pay the outstanding amount, with part payment made via demand draft and a debit note issued for the remaining balance, which was accepted by the petitioner. The key fact is the settlement between the parties leading to the withdrawal of the CIRP petition.
The date on which the…
One of the dates the…
Sign in to view related legal provisions.