M/s Paragon Ceramics filed an application under Section 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, to initiate the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) against M/s Rathi Ispat Ltd. for a default of Rs. 27,97,788, including interest, related to goods supplied. The applicant claimed that the respondent failed to settle the outstanding amount. The applicant had previously filed a recovery suit against the respondent, which resulted in a decree in favor of the applicant. The respondent raised objections, including the maintainability of the application, the validity of the demand notice, and the claim being barred by limitation. The respondent also stated that Punjab National Bank had taken possession of the company's assets under the SARFAESI Act.
M/s Paragon Ceramics (the applicant) supplied basic and high-temperature refractory items to M/s Rathi Ispat Ltd. (the respondent) on various dates, resulting in an outstanding amount of Rs. 27,97,788, including interest. The applicant sent a legal notice to the respondent on 14.12.2009, demanding payment of Rs. 16,39,935 with 16% interest per annum. The applicant issued a letter on 24.03.2010 for the issuance of 'C' FORM for the financial year 2006-07, which the respondent denied, stating the company was closed since October 2007. The applicant filed a suit for recovery against the respondent, which resulted in a decree in favor of the applicant on 26.09.2016. The applicant then filed an execution application, to which the respondent objected, claiming that Punjab
…Sign in to view the parties.
Respondent company stand idle since October,…
Punjab National Bank have taken over…
M/s Paragon Ceramics filed an application under Section 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, to initiate the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) against M/s Rathi Ispat Ltd. for a default of Rs. 27,97,788, including interest, related to goods supplied. The applicant claimed that the respondent failed to settle the outstanding amount. The applicant had previously filed a recovery suit against the respondent, which resulted in a decree in favor of the applicant. The respondent raised objections, including the maintainability of the application, the validity of the demand notice, and the claim being barred by limitation. The respondent also stated that Punjab National Bank had taken possession of the company's assets under the SARFAESI Act.
M/s Paragon Ceramics (the applicant) supplied basic and high-temperature refractory items to M/s Rathi Ispat Ltd. (the respondent) on various dates, resulting in an outstanding amount of Rs. 27,97,788, including interest. The applicant sent a legal notice to the respondent on 14.12.2009, demanding payment of Rs. 16,39,935 with 16% interest per annum. The applicant issued a letter on 24.03.2010 for the issuance of 'C' FORM for the financial year 2006-07, which the respondent denied, stating the company was closed since October 2007. The applicant filed a suit for recovery against the respondent, which resulted in a decree in favor of the applicant on 26.09.2016. The applicant then filed an execution application, to which the respondent objected, claiming that Punjab
…Respondent company stand idle since October,…
Punjab National Bank have taken over…