The case involves Vinayak Advertising Vs. Rajesh Gems and Jewels Pvt. Ltd. & Ors. The remuneration of the previous Resolution Professional (RP) had not been paid despite specific directions. The Counsel for the Operational Creditor, being the biggest claimant in the Committee of Creditors (COC), requested a review of the order regarding the RP's remuneration. The expenses of the RP were ratified and confirmed by the COC. Another application was filed by the RP placing on record the request of the COC to go in for liquidation of the Corporate Debtor.
Vinayak Advertising filed a case against Rajesh Gems and Jewels Pvt. Ltd. & Ors. The previous Resolution Professional (RP) had not been paid their remuneration despite specific directions. The Operational Creditor, being the largest claimant in the Committee of Creditors (COC), sought a review of the order concerning the RP's remuneration. The COC had ratified and confirmed the RP's expenses. The RP filed another application based on the COC's request to liquidate the Corporate Debtor. However, there was no concrete proposal regarding the assets to be liquidated. The key facts are the non-payment of the RP's remuneration, the COC's ratification of expenses, and the request for liquidation without a concrete proposal.
Sign in to view the parties.
Hearing before the New…
Case re-notified for…
The case involves Vinayak Advertising Vs. Rajesh Gems and Jewels Pvt. Ltd. & Ors. The remuneration of the previous Resolution Professional (RP) had not been paid despite specific directions. The Counsel for the Operational Creditor, being the biggest claimant in the Committee of Creditors (COC), requested a review of the order regarding the RP's remuneration. The expenses of the RP were ratified and confirmed by the COC. Another application was filed by the RP placing on record the request of the COC to go in for liquidation of the Corporate Debtor.
Vinayak Advertising filed a case against Rajesh Gems and Jewels Pvt. Ltd. & Ors. The previous Resolution Professional (RP) had not been paid their remuneration despite specific directions. The Operational Creditor, being the largest claimant in the Committee of Creditors (COC), sought a review of the order concerning the RP's remuneration. The COC had ratified and confirmed the RP's expenses. The RP filed another application based on the COC's request to liquidate the Corporate Debtor. However, there was no concrete proposal regarding the assets to be liquidated. The key facts are the non-payment of the RP's remuneration, the COC's ratification of expenses, and the request for liquidation without a concrete proposal.
Hearing before the New…
Case re-notified for…