The case involves Mr. Dheraj Raikhy & Mrs. Bhavna Pant as the applicant/petitioner against M/s. Raheja Developers Ltd. as the respondent. The application was filed under Section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016. The NCLAT granted a stay in Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 864 of 2019, vide order dated 17.09.2019, preventing the Interim Resolution Professional from making any publication for claims or constituting a Committee of Creditors until further orders.
Mr. Dheraj Raikhy & Mrs. Bhavna Pant filed an application against M/s. Raheja Developers Ltd. under Section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016. The NCLAT granted a stay order in Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 864 of 2019, preventing the Interim Resolution Professional from making any publication for claims or constituting a Committee of Creditors. The NCLT acknowledged the stay order and directed the registry not to list the matter until the appellate tribunal pronounces its judgment. The appellant, Mr. Navin Raheja, was given the opportunity to negotiate with the respondents.
Sign in to view the parties.
NCLAT grants stay in…
NCLT acknowledges NCLAT…
The case involves Mr. Dheraj Raikhy & Mrs. Bhavna Pant as the applicant/petitioner against M/s. Raheja Developers Ltd. as the respondent. The application was filed under Section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016. The NCLAT granted a stay in Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 864 of 2019, vide order dated 17.09.2019, preventing the Interim Resolution Professional from making any publication for claims or constituting a Committee of Creditors until further orders.
Mr. Dheraj Raikhy & Mrs. Bhavna Pant filed an application against M/s. Raheja Developers Ltd. under Section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016. The NCLAT granted a stay order in Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 864 of 2019, preventing the Interim Resolution Professional from making any publication for claims or constituting a Committee of Creditors. The NCLT acknowledged the stay order and directed the registry not to list the matter until the appellate tribunal pronounces its judgment. The appellant, Mr. Navin Raheja, was given the opportunity to negotiate with the respondents.
NCLAT grants stay in…
NCLT acknowledges NCLAT…