The case involves a petition filed under Section 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, by Speculum Plast Pvt. Ltd. (the 'Operational Creditor') against M/s PTC Techno Pvt. Ltd. (the 'Corporate Debtor') seeking to initiate corporate insolvency resolution. The Operational Creditor claimed that the Corporate Debtor failed to remit payments for electroplating services rendered between April 11, 2013, and September 19, 2013. The total amount claimed was Rs. 24,18,273.36, including Central Sales Tax. The Operational Creditor served a notice under Section 8 of the Code, but it was returned with the endorsement 'Refused'. The Operational Creditor also filed an affidavit stating that the Corporate Debtor did not dispute the unpaid Operational Debt. The petition was
…Speculum Plast Pvt. Ltd. (Operational Creditor) filed a petition under Section 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, against M/s PTC Techno Pvt. Ltd. (Corporate Debtor). The claim was for Rs. 24,18,273.36, including Central Sales Tax, for electroplating services rendered between April 11, 2013, and September 19, 2013. The Operational Creditor served a notice under Section 8 of the Code, which was returned marked 'Refused'. The Operational Creditor claimed that the Corporate Debtor failed to remit the amounts due. The Operational Creditor submitted that cheques tendered by the Corporate Debtor acknowledged the debt and extended the limitation period. The cheques were dated January 31, 2014, and February 7, 2014. The petition was filed on March 29, 2017. The
…Sign in to view the parties.
Services rendered by…
Services rendered by…
The case involves a petition filed under Section 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, by Speculum Plast Pvt. Ltd. (the 'Operational Creditor') against M/s PTC Techno Pvt. Ltd. (the 'Corporate Debtor') seeking to initiate corporate insolvency resolution. The Operational Creditor claimed that the Corporate Debtor failed to remit payments for electroplating services rendered between April 11, 2013, and September 19, 2013. The total amount claimed was Rs. 24,18,273.36, including Central Sales Tax. The Operational Creditor served a notice under Section 8 of the Code, but it was returned with the endorsement 'Refused'. The Operational Creditor also filed an affidavit stating that the Corporate Debtor did not dispute the unpaid Operational Debt. The petition was
…Speculum Plast Pvt. Ltd. (Operational Creditor) filed a petition under Section 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, against M/s PTC Techno Pvt. Ltd. (Corporate Debtor). The claim was for Rs. 24,18,273.36, including Central Sales Tax, for electroplating services rendered between April 11, 2013, and September 19, 2013. The Operational Creditor served a notice under Section 8 of the Code, which was returned marked 'Refused'. The Operational Creditor claimed that the Corporate Debtor failed to remit the amounts due. The Operational Creditor submitted that cheques tendered by the Corporate Debtor acknowledged the debt and extended the limitation period. The cheques were dated January 31, 2014, and February 7, 2014. The petition was filed on March 29, 2017. The
…Services rendered by…
Services rendered by…