The case pertains to a matter before the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT), Mumbai Bench. The hearing was held on April 13, 2017. The petitioner's counsel stated that the matter was settled between the parties.
The case involves M/s. Bharat Radiators. Faiza A. Dhanani, representing Dhruve Liladhar & Co., served as the advocate for the applicant/financial creditor. Yuvraj K. Singh, representing Desai & Diwanji, served as the advocate for the respondent/corporate debtor. The petitioner's counsel stated that the matter was settled between the parties, leading to a request for withdrawal of the petition. The relevance of the settlement is that it led to the dismissal of the petition, indicating a resolution outside of court intervention.
Sign in to view the parties.
Hearing of the Mumbai…
Petitioner Counsel stated the matter is…
Sign in to view related legal provisions.
The case pertains to a matter before the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT), Mumbai Bench. The hearing was held on April 13, 2017. The petitioner's counsel stated that the matter was settled between the parties.
The case involves M/s. Bharat Radiators. Faiza A. Dhanani, representing Dhruve Liladhar & Co., served as the advocate for the applicant/financial creditor. Yuvraj K. Singh, representing Desai & Diwanji, served as the advocate for the respondent/corporate debtor. The petitioner's counsel stated that the matter was settled between the parties, leading to a request for withdrawal of the petition. The relevance of the settlement is that it led to the dismissal of the petition, indicating a resolution outside of court intervention.
Hearing of the Mumbai…
Petitioner Counsel stated the matter is…
Sign in to view related legal provisions.