The case involves an application filed for waiver of costs imposed on the Corporate Debtor for a delay in filing a reply. The Corporate Debtor was initially given two weeks to file a reply, but the authorized representative was indisposed and unable to travel from Delhi to provide instructions. Court vacation followed, and the counsel was unavailable, preventing the timely filing of the reply. On the next hearing date, the reply was ready and requested to be filed, but it was allowed subject to cost.
Enkay (India) Rubber Co. Pvt. Ltd. filed a case against Prayag Polytech Pvt. Ltd. The Corporate Debtor, Prayag Polytech Pvt. Ltd., faced a cost imposition for delaying the filing of a reply. The delay occurred because the authorized representative was indisposed and unable to travel from Delhi to give instructions. The court vacation and counsel unavailability further contributed to the delay. The reply was eventually ready, but its filing was allowed subject to cost. The Corporate Debtor then filed an application (IA No. 220/JPR/2019) to waive the imposed cost, arguing the delay was unintentional. The learned counsel for the applicant did not raise any objection.
Sign in to view the parties.
The court ordered that…
The reply was ready, and the Corporate Debtor…
The case involves an application filed for waiver of costs imposed on the Corporate Debtor for a delay in filing a reply. The Corporate Debtor was initially given two weeks to file a reply, but the authorized representative was indisposed and unable to travel from Delhi to provide instructions. Court vacation followed, and the counsel was unavailable, preventing the timely filing of the reply. On the next hearing date, the reply was ready and requested to be filed, but it was allowed subject to cost.
Enkay (India) Rubber Co. Pvt. Ltd. filed a case against Prayag Polytech Pvt. Ltd. The Corporate Debtor, Prayag Polytech Pvt. Ltd., faced a cost imposition for delaying the filing of a reply. The delay occurred because the authorized representative was indisposed and unable to travel from Delhi to give instructions. The court vacation and counsel unavailability further contributed to the delay. The reply was eventually ready, but its filing was allowed subject to cost. The Corporate Debtor then filed an application (IA No. 220/JPR/2019) to waive the imposed cost, arguing the delay was unintentional. The learned counsel for the applicant did not raise any objection.
The court ordered that…
The reply was ready, and the Corporate Debtor…