The case involves an application under Section 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC). The Court Officer was directed to send notice to the Corporate Debtor on 15.04.2021. Despite the registry sending notice and providing a last chance, neither the applicant nor the Corporate Debtor appeared before the court.
The applicant, Entertainment Network India Ltd., filed an application under Section 9 of the IBC against the respondent, Praise Communications Pvt.Ltd. On 15.04.2021, the Court Officer was directed to send notice to the Corporate Debtor. On 17.08.2021, no one appeared for the applicant. The registry sent notice and gave a last chance to the Corporate Debtor. On the day of the order, neither the applicant nor the Corporate Debtor appeared. As a result, the application was dismissed for default. The key fact is the absence of both parties despite prior notice, leading to the dismissal.
Sign in to view the parties.
The Court Officer was…
None appeared…
The case involves an application under Section 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC). The Court Officer was directed to send notice to the Corporate Debtor on 15.04.2021. Despite the registry sending notice and providing a last chance, neither the applicant nor the Corporate Debtor appeared before the court.
The applicant, Entertainment Network India Ltd., filed an application under Section 9 of the IBC against the respondent, Praise Communications Pvt.Ltd. On 15.04.2021, the Court Officer was directed to send notice to the Corporate Debtor. On 17.08.2021, no one appeared for the applicant. The registry sent notice and gave a last chance to the Corporate Debtor. On the day of the order, neither the applicant nor the Corporate Debtor appeared. As a result, the application was dismissed for default. The key fact is the absence of both parties despite prior notice, leading to the dismissal.
The Court Officer was…
None appeared…