The case involves an application (CA No.510/2019) moved under Section 12(A) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, concerning the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) of a Corporate Debtor. The CIRP was initiated following a petition by an Operational Creditor and admitted by the Tribunal. An Interim Resolution Professional (IRP), Mr. Vishal Malhotra, was appointed. However, attempts to constitute a Committee of Creditors (COC) were unsuccessful despite compliance with IBC, 2016, due to the Operational Creditor and Corporate Debtor settling the matter between themselves and the absence of any other claims.
An Operational Creditor filed a petition seeking the initiation of Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) against a Corporate Debtor. The Tribunal admitted the petition and appointed Mr. Vishal Malhotra as the Interim Resolution Professional (IRP). Attempts to constitute a Committee of Creditors (COC) were unsuccessful despite compliance with the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC), 2016, including newspaper publications in Chandigarh and Delhi. The Operational Creditor and the Corporate Debtor were settling the matter between themselves, and no other claims were received. The IRP filed an application to close the CIRP, stating that the necessary forms had been lodged and expenses covered. The Tribunal considered the application and the consent of the IRP.
Sign in to view the parties.
Tribunal admit…
Publication in…
Sign in to view related legal provisions.
The case involves an application (CA No.510/2019) moved under Section 12(A) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, concerning the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) of a Corporate Debtor. The CIRP was initiated following a petition by an Operational Creditor and admitted by the Tribunal. An Interim Resolution Professional (IRP), Mr. Vishal Malhotra, was appointed. However, attempts to constitute a Committee of Creditors (COC) were unsuccessful despite compliance with IBC, 2016, due to the Operational Creditor and Corporate Debtor settling the matter between themselves and the absence of any other claims.
An Operational Creditor filed a petition seeking the initiation of Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) against a Corporate Debtor. The Tribunal admitted the petition and appointed Mr. Vishal Malhotra as the Interim Resolution Professional (IRP). Attempts to constitute a Committee of Creditors (COC) were unsuccessful despite compliance with the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC), 2016, including newspaper publications in Chandigarh and Delhi. The Operational Creditor and the Corporate Debtor were settling the matter between themselves, and no other claims were received. The IRP filed an application to close the CIRP, stating that the necessary forms had been lodged and expenses covered. The Tribunal considered the application and the consent of the IRP.
Tribunal admit…
Publication in…
Sign in to view related legal provisions.