The case involves an application (MA/34/2020) within the context of CP/563/IB/2017. The learned Liquidator is present with counsel, stating that the order passed by the NCLAT on 17.07.2019 related to Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No.116 of 2019 and Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No.117 of 2019, concerning Arokiasamy Joseb Raj -vs- Pathukasahasram Raghunathan Raman & Oths. A scheme was filed before the Liquidator, but the claim was rejected based on the decision of the Stakeholders Committee and the Liquidator, considering Section 29-A of the IBC, 2016. The application seeks a decision from the Tribunal regarding the relief sought.
The case originates from CP/563/IB/2017. A scheme was presented to the Liquidator concerning Arokiasamy Joseb Raj -vs- Pathukasahasram Raghunathan Raman & Oths. The Stakeholders Committee and the Liquidator rejected the claim, citing Section 29-A of the IBC, 2016. The Respondents, who are also the Scheme Proponents, allege they did not receive formal communication about the rejection. The Liquidator then sought to withdraw the application before the Tribunal.
Sign in to view the parties.
Order passed by the Hon'ble NCLAT in relation…
Hearing of C…
Sign in to view related legal provisions.
The case involves an application (MA/34/2020) within the context of CP/563/IB/2017. The learned Liquidator is present with counsel, stating that the order passed by the NCLAT on 17.07.2019 related to Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No.116 of 2019 and Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No.117 of 2019, concerning Arokiasamy Joseb Raj -vs- Pathukasahasram Raghunathan Raman & Oths. A scheme was filed before the Liquidator, but the claim was rejected based on the decision of the Stakeholders Committee and the Liquidator, considering Section 29-A of the IBC, 2016. The application seeks a decision from the Tribunal regarding the relief sought.
The case originates from CP/563/IB/2017. A scheme was presented to the Liquidator concerning Arokiasamy Joseb Raj -vs- Pathukasahasram Raghunathan Raman & Oths. The Stakeholders Committee and the Liquidator rejected the claim, citing Section 29-A of the IBC, 2016. The Respondents, who are also the Scheme Proponents, allege they did not receive formal communication about the rejection. The Liquidator then sought to withdraw the application before the Tribunal.
Order passed by the Hon'ble NCLAT in relation…
Hearing of C…
Sign in to view related legal provisions.